9512.net
甜梦文库
当前位置:首页 >> >>

Dynamics of the Globular Cluster System Associated with M87 (NGC 4486). II. Analysis



Accepted for Publication in the Astrophysical Journal
A Preprint typeset using L TEX style emulateapj

DYNAMICS OF THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM ASSOCIATED WITH M87 (NGC 4486). II. ANALYSIS
? t? Patrick Co e1,2,3,4 , Dean E. McLaughlin4,5,6 , David A. Hanes4,7,8,14 , Terry J. 4,8,9,10 Bridges , Doug Geisler11,12,13 , David Merritt2 , James E. Hesser14 , Gretchen L.H. Harris15 , Myung Gyoon Lee16 Accepted for Publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Institute of Technology, Mail Stop 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA 3 Sherman M. Fairchild Fellow 4 Visiting Astronomer, Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, operated by the National Research Council of Canada, the Centre National de la Recherche Scienti?que of France, and the University of Hawaii. 5 Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA 6 Hubble Fellow 7 Department of Physics, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada 8 Anglo-Australian Observatory, P.O. Box 296, Epping, NSW, 1710, Australia 9 Royal Greenwich Observatory, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EZ, UK 10 Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 11 Grupo de Astronom? ?a Dpto. de F? ?sica, Universidad de Concepci? on, Casilla 160-C, Concepci? on, Chile 12 Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. 13 Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. 14 Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada 15 Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada 16 Astronomy Program, SEES, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
2 Department 1 California

arXiv:astro-ph/0106005v1 31 May 2001

1

2

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM ABSTRACT We present a dynamical analysis of the globular cluster system associated with M87 (= NGC 4486), the cD galaxy near the dynamical center of the Virgo cluster. The analysis utilizes a new spectroscopic and photometric database which is described in a companion paper (Hanes et al. 2001). Using a sample of 278 globular clusters with measured radial velocities and metallicities, and new surface density pro?les based on wide-?eld Washington photometry, we study the dynamics of the M87 globular cluster system both globally — for the entire cluster sample — and separately — for the metal-rich and metal-poor globular cluster samples. This constitutes the largest sample of radial velocities for pure Population II tracers yet assembled for any galaxy. Our principal ?ndings are summarized as follows: (1) Surface density pro?les constructed from our Washington photometry reveal the metal-poor cluster system to be more spatially extended than its metal-rich counterpart, consistent with earlier ?ndings based on HST imaging in the central regions of the galaxy. Beyond a radius of R ? 1.5Re (10 kpc), the metal-poor component dominates the total globular cluster system. (2) When considered in their entirety, each of the combined, metal-poor and metal-rich globular cluster samples (278, 161 and 117 clusters, respectively) appear to rotate, with similar rotation amplitudes, about axes whose position angles are indistinguishable from that of the photometric minor axis, Θ0 = 65? . (3) The one-dimensional rotation curve (i.e., binned in circular annuli) for the metal-rich cluster system ?1 has a roughly constant mean amplitude of ?R = 160+120 . The metal-rich clusters appear ?99 km s to be rotating, at all radii, about the photometric minor axis of the galaxy. However, a smoothed, two-dimensional map of the line-of-sight velocity residuals suggests that the rotation ?eld for the metal-rich clusters is non-cylindrical in nature. Instead, it exhibits a “double-lobed” pattern, with maxima at R ? 3.5-4Re (25-30 kpc) along the approximate photometric major axis of the galaxy. (4) The one-dimensional rotation curve of the metal-poor cluster system has mean amplitude of ?R = ?1 172+51 . The two-dimensional map of the rotation ?eld for the metal-poor clusters shows ?108 km s some evidence for solid-body rotation or, alternatively, for a “shear” in the line-of-sight velocity. This shear is similar in size and orientation to that observed for Virgo galaxies within two degrees of M87, and is consistent with a scenario, previously suggested on the basis of dwarf galaxy kinematics and x-ray imaging, in which material is gradually infalling onto M87 along the so-called “principal axis” of the Virgo cluster. (5) Beyond a radius of R ? 2Re (15 kpc), the approximate onset of the galaxy’s cD envelope, the metalpoor globular cluster system rotates about the photometric minor axis — similar to its metal-rich counterpart. Inside this radius, however, the metal-poor clusters appear to rotate around the photometric major axis. (6) The complete sample of 278 globular clusters has an almost perfectly isotropic velocity ellipsoid, 2 2 with βcl = 1 ? σθ /σr ? 0. (7) When considered separately, the metal-poor cluster system shows a modest but signi?cant tangential bias of βcl ? ?0.4, while the velocity ellipsoid of the metal-rich cluster system is radially biased, with βcl ? +0.4. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the dual nature of the M87 globular cluster system — ?rst identi?ed on the basis of its bimodal metallicity distribution — also extends to its dynamical properties. We discuss the implications of these ?ndings for the various formation scenarios proposed for giant elliptical galaxies and their globular cluster systems. Subject headings: galaxies: halos — galaxies: clusters — galaxies: individual (M87) — galaxies: kinematics and dynamics — galaxies: star clusters
1. INTRODUCTION

As surviving relics from the epoch of galaxy formation, globular clusters (GCs) provide important insights into the processes which shaped their present day host galaxies. The observed properties of GCs in giant elliptical galaxies — such as their total numbers, chemical abundances and spatial distributions — have been used alternatively to argue for a wide diversity of formation processes including dissipative (monolithic) collapse, spiral-spiral mergers (Ashman & Zepf 1992), multi-modal star formation histories caused by galactic winds (Harris, Harris & McLaughlin 1998), and dissipationless hierarchical growth (C? ot? e, Marzke & West 1998; C? ot? e et al. 2000). There is, however, one important piece of observational evidence which has been almost entirely absent in such discussions — the dynamical properties of the GCs. Due to the faintness of even the most luminous GCs in nearby giant elliptical galaxies, the requisite spectroscopic observations are extremely challenging, and it is only recently that radial velocities for signi?cant samples of clusters have been accumulated

? E ? ET AL. COT

3

in a handful of galaxies (e.g., Cohen & Ryzhov 1997; Sharples et al. 1998; Zepf et al. 2000). M87, the incipient cD galaxy near the dynamical center of the Virgo cluster, o?ers an ideal testing ground for the various formation scenarios. It has by far the most populous globular cluster system (GCS) of any nearby galaxy (e.g., Ncl ? 13,500; McLaughlin et al. 1994), and a wealth of observational data has been accumulated for both the galaxy itself, and the surrounding Virgo cluster. Such material includes numerous analyses of the photometric properties and spatial distribution of M87 GCs (e.g ., Strom et al. 1981; McLaughlin et al. 1994; Geisler, Lee & Kim 2001), surface brightness pro?les for the galaxy light (de Vaucouleurs & Nieto 1978; Carter & Dixon 1978), stellar dynamical studies of the central regions of M87 (van der Marel 1994), photometric and radial velocity surveys of surrounding Virgo cluster galaxies (Binggeli, Sandage & Tammann 1985; Binggeli, Popescu & Tammann 1993; Girardi et al. 1996), and X-ray observations of the hot intracluster gas which ?lls the Virgo gravitational potential well (Nulsen & B¨ ohringer 1995). The dynamics of the M87 GCS have been addressed in several previous studies, albeit in varying levels of detail. Early e?orts (Huchra & Brodie 1987; Mould, Oke & Nemec 1987; Mould et al. 1990) were hampered by limited sample sizes: for example, the compilation of Mould et al. (1990) consisted of radial velocities for only 43 clusters. Although these data were su?cient to provide a provisional mass estimate for M87, and to hint at the presence of rotation in the GCS, it was shown by Merritt & Tremblay (1993) that this sample provides only weak constraints on the distribution of dark matter in the M87 halo. Moreover, Merritt & Tremblay (1993) demonstrated that a measurement of the velocity anisotropy of GCS would require radial velocities for a minimum sample of several hundred clusters. In a major observational e?ort, Cohen & Ryzhov (1997) used the Keck telescope to measure radial velocities for a total of 205 GCs surrounding M87. Using these data, Cohen & Ryzhov (1997) found clear evidence for a rising velocity dispersion pro?le, and derived a total mass of M = (3.8 ± 1.2) × 1012 M⊙ within a volume of radius of r ? 33 kpc centered on M87. An independent analysis of these velocities by Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998) suggested that the M87 GCS is rotating rapidly at large radii: i.e., ?R ? 300 km s?1 beyond a projected radius of R = 3Re (20 kpc).17 This rapid rotation was subsequently con?rmed by Cohen (2000) who augmented her original radial velocity sample to include 17 additional clusters having R ≥ 3Re . While the amount of angular momentum implied by these results is large, there is emerging evidence from radial velocity surveys of planetary nebulae that giant elliptical galaxies may, as a class, rotate rapidly at large radii (e.g., Hui et al. 1995; Arnaboldi et al. 1996; 1998). An enormous amount of theoretical e?ort has been devoted to understanding the acquisition of angular momentum during galaxy formation: e.g., via tidal torques in monolithic collapse scenarios (Peebles 1969), or through the conversion of orbital and spin angular momentum of the progenitor galaxies in major (Heyl, Hernquist & Spergel 1996) and multiple (Weil & Hernquist 1996) mergers. The angular momentum content of elliptical galaxies may thus constitute an important clue to their formation; ultimately, the rotation properties of the chemically distinct GC populations in these galaxies may provide a powerful means of discriminating between the various formation models described above. In this paper, we present a dynamical analysis of the M87 GCS using an improved and expanded sample of radial velocities. In addition, new Washington CT1 photometry is used to derive metallicities for all program objects, and to investigate correlations between metallicity and dynamics by carrying out separate analyses for both the metal-rich and metal-poor GC populations.
2. THE DATABASE

The database used in the analysis presented below is a subset of that which has been described in detail in a companion paper (Hanes et al. 2001; hereafter Paper I), so only a brief summary is given here. The reader is referred to Paper I for a complete description of the sample properties, observational material and data reductions. 2.1. Photometry and Radial Velocities One of our goals is to investigate the relationship between GC dynamics and metallicity, so we require homogeneous metallicity estimates for our sample of clusters. Such information is most easily obtained from broadband photometry. Unfortunately, although there have been numerous photometric studies of the M87 GCs, the large areal coverage of our radial velocity survey means that no single existing survey includes all of our program objects. For instance, the most extensive publsihed photometric survey of the M87 GCS remains that of Strom et al. (1981), who presented photographic U BR photometry for 1728 candidate GCs surrounding M87. Yet our sample includes many objects not included in the Strom et al. (1981) catalog: e.g., objects that are at large radii, beyond the limits of their survey, or close to the galaxy center where crowding and background contamination is severe. Therefore, as described in Paper I, we have obtained deep, wide-?eld CCD images centered on M87 using the CTIO and KPNO 4m telescope. Imaging was carried out in Washington C and T1 ?lters, since the long color baseline of the C?T1 index provides exceptional metallicity sensitivity (see, e.g., Geisler, Lee & Kim 1996). The photometric observations, calibrations, and reductions have been described brie?y in Paper I, while a more comprehensive description of the photometric properties of the M87 GCS based on these data will be presented in a forthcoming paper (Geisler, Lee & Kim 2001). The sample of radial velocities we begin with here consists of data for 334 candidate and previously con?rmed GCs. This number includes 145 measurements from the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope (CFHT), 87 of which are for targets not observed in any of the previous surveys of Huchra & Brodie (1987), Mould, Oke & Nemec (1987), Mould et al. (1990),
17 According to de Vaucouleurs & Nieto (1978), R = 96′′ for M87. Throughout this paper, we adopt an M87 distance of D = 15 Mpc (Pierce e et al. 1994; Ferrarese et al. 1996), so that 1′ = 4.364 kpc.

4

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 1.— Upper Left Panel: Distribution of (C?T1 ) colors for 334 globular cluster candidates with measured radial velocities (solid histogram). For comparison, the color distribution of all 2744 globular cluster candidates from the photometric study of Geisler, Lee & Kim (2001) is shown as the dashed histogram. The dashed vertical lines indicate our adopted selection criteria on color, 0.80 ≤ (C?T1 ) ≤ 2.35 mag, while the dotted vertical line shows the color, (C?T1 ) = 1.42, used to isolate the blue and red cluster samples. Upper Right: Radial velocity histogram for the 334 candidate globular clusters with accurate (C?T1 ) colors. The vertical lines show our adopted selection criteria on velocity: 200 ≤ v ≤ 2550 km s?1 . Lower Panel: Color vs. radial velocity for our initial sample of 334 objects. The dotted region shows the joint selection criteria on color and radial velocity. This box de?nes a ?nal sample of 278 bona ?de globular clusters.

Cohen & Ryzhov (1997), or Cohen (2000). The total is down slightly from the full database of 352 objects in Paper I, as we have discarded out of hand 12 targets for which we were unable to obtain unambiguous Washington photometry (ID nos. 881, 5053, 5055, 5058, 5064, 5065, 5066, 5067, 5071, 9002, 9051, and 9052 from Paper I); ?ve which were already identi?ed by Cohen & Ryzhov (1997; CR97) as Galactic M stars (ID nos. 38, 87, 782, 1551, 8001); and one object which turns out to be visibly non-stellar (ID no. 207). All measurements have been transformed onto common astrometric and radial velocity scales. We adopt the radial velocity and uncertainty from our own analysis for all targets observed at the CFHT and transform all other data to this system as described in Paper I. Brie?y, cluster candidates that were not observed at the CFHT, but were observed at Keck by Cohen & Ryzhov (1997), are transformed onto our MOS velocity scale according to: vp (MOS) = 0.96 vp (CR97) + 91 and assigned an uncertainty of ±100 km s?1 , as recommended by these authors.18 Objects measured neither by us nor by Cohen & Ryzhov (1997), but by Cohen (2000), are transformed as: vp (MOS) = 0.98 vp (C2000) + 120 and given an uncertainty of ±50 km s?1 . Finally, to targets with velocities recorded only by Mould et al. (1987) or Mould et al. (1990), we apply the correction: vp (MOS) = 0.76 vp (Mould) + 280 and adopt an uncertainty of ±200 km s?1 . 2.2. Sample Selection Before proceeding with the dynamical analysis, it is important to ?rst identify a sample of bona ?de M87 GCs. Culling Galactic ?eld stars from the sample on the basis of radial velocity is not trivial since the relatively low systemic velocity of M87 (1277 ± 2 km s?1 ; van der Marel 1994) and the high velocity dispersion of the GCs (i.e., σp ? 400 km s?1 ; see §3) make the correct choice of the low velocity cuto? problematical. We adopted a selection criterion of:
18 Here

and throughout, quantities referred to the line of sight are denoted by a subscript p.

200 ≤ vp ≤ 2550 km s?1 .

(1)

? E ? ET AL. COT

5

Fig. 2.— Spatial distribution of the 278 con?rmed globular clusters around M87 (i.e., all objects falling within the boxed region of the bottom panel of Figure 1). The center of the galaxy is at (0, 0), the inner circle marks the e?ective radius of the stellar mass of M87 (Re = 96′′ ? 7 kpc), and the outer circle has a radius of 414′′ ? 30 kpc ? 4.3Re . The diagonal line shows the photometric major axis of the galaxy.

This range is roughly symmetric about the mean velocity, vp = 1350 km s?1 , of the M87 GCS (see §3) and is expected to exclude the vast majority of foreground stars and background galaxies. We also imposed a selection on C?T1 color, discarding all objects which did not have colors within the range: 0.8 ≤ C ? T1 ≤ 2.35 mag. (2)

The Galactic foreground extinction in the direction of M87, according to the DIRBE maps of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998), is E(B-V) = 0.022 mag, which corresponds to E(C?T1 ) = 0.045 mag (Secker et al. 1995). The metallicity calibration of Geisler & Forte (1990) suggests that this color selection will con?ne our sample to clusters having metallicities in range ?2.6 ≤ [Fe/H] ≤ 1.0 dex, an interval which should encompass virtually all GCs in M87 (e.g., Cohen, Blakeslee & Ryzhov 1998). These selection criteria are illustrated in the upper panels of Figure 1. The ?lled histograms in these two panels show the color and velocity distributions for all 334 candidate GCs with measured radial velocities and (C?T1 ) colors. The dashed vertical lines in each panel show the adopted upper and lower selection limits. The dotted vertical line in the upper left panel shows our adopted dividing point between the metal-rich and metal-poor cluster populations: C?T1 = 1.42. This color, which corresponds to a metallicity of [Fe/H] = ?1.16 dex, was chosen based on the observed dip in the (C?T1 ) distribution of the 2744 globular cluster candidates from the photometric catalog of Geisler et al. (2001) which have T1 ≤ 22 (i.e., the dashed histogram in this panel). The lower panel of Figure 1 is a color-velocity diagram for these same objects. The dotted region shows the joint selection criteria on color and velocity, which together identify a total of 278 bona ?de GCs. Of these, 161 are classi?ed as “blue” (C?T1 < 1.42), or metal-poor, and 117 are considered “red” (C?T1 > 1.42), or metal-rich, for purposes of the analysis and modelling in §§3 and 4 below. Note that three objects (ID nos. 161, 508, and 1602) have radial velocities which are appropriate for M87 GCs, and yet have C?T1 colors which are far too red for true clusters (i.e., the inferred metallicities are typically several hundred times above solar). A fourth candidate (ID no. 5002) has a radial velocity near the mean of the GC sample, but an anomalously blue color. Although we have no reason to suspect either the colors or the velocities of these objects, their nature is unclear and additional observations are clearly warranted, ?rst and foremost to con?rm our results (particularly for Strom 508, an unresolved object which has a high radial velocity of vp = 5817 ± 120 km s?1 but a very red color of C?T1 ? 3.0). In any event, all four are omitted from the following analysis. Our innermost GC is projected to a distance of roughly 36′′ from the center of M87 (or about 2.6 kpc for our assumed distance of 15 Mpc to the galaxy), while the outermost member of our sample lies at R ? 631′′ ? 46 kpc. Figure 2 shows the distribution on the sky of all 278 bona ?de GCs (i.e., those objects falling inside the dotted region in the lower panel of Figure 1). The solid points on this plot denote 109 clusters which were observed by us at the CFHT; of these, 54 are entirely new measurements and the rest are repeat observations of GCs identi?ed in one of the earlier studies. The

6

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

open symbols refer to data taken from these other surveys, as indicated in the legend. The straight line running through the ?gure represents the photometric major axis of the M87 halo light (oriented at 155? East of North; Carter & Dixon 1978), the inner circle marks the e?ective radius of the galaxy light (Re = 96′′ ? 7 kpc [de Vaucouleurs & Nieto 1978]), and the larger, dashed circle has a radius of 414′′ ? 30 kpc ? 4.3Re . Outside this circle, the azimuthal coverage of the composite radial-velocity database is far from complete, a situation which can signi?cantly compromise any inferences on the kinematics of the GCS at such large galactocentric distances (see below).
3. KINEMATICS OF THE CLUSTER SYSTEM

In previous analyses of the kinematics of the M87 GCS, investigators have usually proceeded by ?tting sine curves to their line-of-sight velocities, vp , as a function of projected azimuth, Θ, in order to test for the presence of rotation and to measure its amplitude (see Cohen & Ryzhov 1997; Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt 1998; Cohen 2000) We shall do the same here, but we pause ?rst to clarify precisely what this assumes about the intrinsic velocity ?eld of the GCS. 3.1. Mathematical Context Consider a spherical GCS rotating about some axis, with an angular velocity ω that may be any axisymmetric function of position inside the galaxy.19 Let r, θ, and φ denote the usual spherical coordinate system within the GCS, such that θ = 0 naturally identi?es its rotation axis and its volume density n is a function only of the galactocentric distance r. Also de?ne a projected, circular coordinate system on the plane of the sky by the radial coordinate R and the azimuth Θ. The projected (surface) density of the GCS, N , is, by the spherical hypothesis, a function of R alone:


N (R) = 2
R

n(r) √

However, its projected angular velocity, ?, which is just the average of ω along the line of sight through the GCS, may be a function of R and Θ both. Assuming that the cluster system is viewed so that its rotation axis lies exactly in the plane of the sky and coincides with Θ = 0, we have ?(R, Θ) = 2 N (R)
∞ R

r dr . r 2 ? R2

(3)

where vφ may still, in general, be any function of r and θ. Equation (4) makes it clear that the apparent angular velocity will be a function of R alone, ? = ?(R), if ω is a function only of r, i.e., if the intrinsic angular velocity of the GCS is constant on spherical surfaces. This is just what is required, as equation (5) shows explicitly, to have vp ∝ sin Θ, and thus to justify ?tting a sinusoid to our radial velocity data as a function of projected azimuth. It is worth emphasizing this point, even though it is not new (see, e.g., Fillmore 1986): the projected angular velocity of a spherical GCS is constant on circles in the plane of the sky — so that its linear velocity vp varies sinusoidally with projected azimuth Θ — if the intrinsic angular velocity is constant on spheres, such that vφ ∝ sin θ. It happens that the variation of vp with Θ in our sample of M87 GCs is adequately described, at all galactocentric radii, by a simple sine curve (see below), and we interpret this as an indication that the angular velocity ?eld of the GCS is strati?ed approximately on spherical surfaces: vφ /(r sin θ) = ω (r). This interpretation is somewhat di?erent from that adopted by Cohen & Ryzhov (1997), and apparently by Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998), who ?t sines to their vp vs. Θ data and then posit that the intrinsic vφ ?eld of the GCS is strati?ed on cylinders. The only way that both of these assumptions can be simultaneously true — that is, vp ∝ sin Θ and vφ depending on r and θ only through the combination (r sin θ) — is in the special case of solid-body rotation, ω = ? = constant. This would, of course, require that ?R ∝ R. Unfortunately, the data neither rule out this possibility nor present a compelling case for it (see, e.g., Figure 8 below). We shall return to the issue of possible solid-body rotation below, and in §5.7 for the speci?c case of the metal-poor GCS (see Figure 19). In summary, we assume that: (1) the GCS of M87 can be approximated as spherical [n = n(r) and N = N (R)]; (2) its angular velocity ?eld is constant on spheres [ω = ω (r) and ? = ?(R)]; and (3) its rotation axis lies exactly in the plane of the sky and coincides with Θ = 0. We are then able to investigate the rotation of the GCS by ?tting our observed radial velocities with the function vp (Θ) = vsys + (?R) sin(Θ ? Θ0 ) , (6) where Θ0 (measured, as Θ is, in degrees East of North), locates the GCS rotation axis, and where the rotation amplitude ?R can in principle be any function of projected galactocentric radius R.
19 While it is clearly imperfect (see, e.g., McLaughlin, Harris, & Hanes 1994), the assumption of spherical symmetry in the M87 GCS is not grossly in error, and we invoke it as a simplifying approximation throughout this paper. 20 The φ direction wraps around the rotation axis by de?nition.

where cos θ = (R cos Θ)/r by simple geometry (see also Fillmore 1986). In addition to this, the angular velocities ω and ? are related to the linear velocities vφ — the intrinsic streaming, or rotation, velocity of the GCS20 — and vp — the averaged component of velocity along the line of sight — in the usual way: ω = vφ /(r sin θ) and ? = vp /R sin Θ. Thus, r dr R sin Θ ∞ vφ √ vp = 2 , (5) n(r) N (R) R r sin θ r2 ? R2

r dr , n(r)ω (r, θ) √ r 2 ? R2

(4)

? E ? ET AL. COT 3.2. Global Kinematic Properties

7

Figure 3 shows the dependence of radial velocity on azimuth for our full sample of 278 GCs in M87, for our subsample of 161 blue clusters (de?ned by 0.80 ≤ C?T1 ≤ 1.42), and for our subsample of 117 red GCs (1.42 ≤ C?T1 ≤ 2.35). Overlaid on the data in each case is the best-?t sine. For the full sample, we ?nd a rotation amplitude of ?R = 169+42 ?97 km s?1 , where the quoted errors refer to 90% con?dence intervals. This rotation amplitude is somewhat larger than the value of ?R ? 100 km s?1 estimated by Cohen & Ryzhov (1997), although still consistent given the rather large uncertainties. The best-?t position angle of the rotation axis for the full sample is Θ0 = 66? ± 35? E of N. The photometric minor axis of the underlying galaxy light is similarly oriented to Θphot = 65? (Carter & Dixon 1978), a correspondence that is consistent with our simplifying assumption that we are viewing the GCS essentially edge-on. We separately ?nd ?R = 172+51 ?108 km ?1 ? s?1 and Θ0 = 59? ± 52? for the entire sample of metal-poor clusters, and ?R = 160+120 km s and Θ = 76 ± 45? for 0 ?99 +27 the metal-rich sample. The dispersion of velocities about the best-?tting sine is σp,r = 384?32 km s?1 for the full sample, ?1 σp,r = 397+37 for the metal-poor clusters, and σp,r = 364+49 ?46 km s ?52 for the metal-rich clusters. We conclude, therefore, that rotation is present in the M87 GCS and is signi?cant at a high con?dence level, for the blue and red subsystems alike. Moreover, the metal-poor and metal-rich clusters in our sample have: (1) essentially identical rotation amplitudes; (2) rotation axes that coincide with one another and with the photometric minor axis of the galaxy; and (3) similar fractions of their total kinetic energy stored in rotation [(?R/σp,r )2 ? 0.2 ± 0.1 in each case]. Thus, within the observational uncertainties, there is no obvious di?erence between the global kinematics of the two subsystems. We caution, however, that this is just a thumbnail sketch of the kinematics, averaged over the full range of galactocentric radii spanned by the GCs in our radial-velocity sample. As was stressed above, the quantity ?R can, in principle, be a function of projected radius — as might be the rotation axis Θ0 and the dispersion of the line-of-sight velocities. While Figure 3 is useful as a rough summary of the situation, it is necessarily limited. Thus, we sort our GCs into a number of distinct circular annuli and ?t sine curves separately to vp vs. Θ in each annulus to investigate possible radial variations in the kinematics of the total, blue, and red cluster systems. Table 1 lists the results of this exercise and includes full details of the global kinematics discussed just above. The ?rst column of the Table de?nes the annulus in question (with 1′′ = 0.073 kpc for a distance of 15 Mpc to M87), the second and third columns gives the median radius (in arcseconds and kpc) of the clusters in that radial bin, and the fourth records the number of objects in it. The ?fth and six columns then give the mean line-of-sight velocity of the clusters (ignoring any rotation that might be present, and estimated using the robust, biweight measure of “location” discussed by Beers, Flynn, & Gebhardt 1990) and the dispersion of their velocities about this mean value (i.e., the biweight “scale” of Beers et al.

Fig. 3.— Radial velocity vs. azimuth for the full sample of 278 con?rmed globular clusters, and separately for the 161 blue clusters with 0.80 ≤ (C?T1 ) ≤ 1.42 and the 117 red globular clusters with 1.42 ≤ (C?T1 ) ≤ 2.35. The best-?t sine curve, vp = vsys + (?R) sin(Θ ? Θ0 ), is overlaid in each case; see Table 1 for a listing of the parameters. The orientation of the photometric minor axis of M87 is indicated by the vertical arrows in each panel at Θ = 65? and 245? East of North.

8

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 4.— Line-of-sight velocity vs. azimuth for M87 globular clusters in six radial bins. From top to bottom, the panels show clusters in the range: (1) 35′′ ≤ R < 125′′ ; (2) 125′′ ≤ R < 207′′ ; (3) 207′′ ≤ R < 297′′ ; (4) 297′′ ≤ R < 380′′ ; (5) 380′′ ≤ R < 414′′ ; (6) 414′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ . Filled circles are metal-poor (blue) globular clusters, and solid lines are their best-?t sine curves with parameters given in Table 1. Open circles denote the metal-rich (red) globular clusters, and broken lines trace the best-?t sine curves (with parameters also given in Table 1). Note that the identical sine curves shown in the bottom two panels have been derived from the combined data: i.e., using all clusters in the range 380′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ .

1990). The uncertainties on these values, and on all quantities in Table 1, de?ne a 90% con?dence interval. They are estimated using a numerical bootstrap procedure in which 1000 arti?cial datasets are constructed by randomly choosing N clusters from among the actual data in an annulus. The mean and dispersion are computed for each of these 1000 trial datasets, the results are sorted, and the values corresponding to the 5th and 95th percentiles are identi?ed; uncertainties are then de?ned as the o?sets between these values and the actual vp and σp computed from the read data. Columns 7, 8, and 9 of Table 1 give the rotation parameters in each annulus, for each of our GC subsamples. These are determined by an error-weighted, nonlinear, least-squares ?t of the sinusoid in equation (6), and their 90% con?dence intervals follow from ?tting vp vs. Θ for each of the 1000 arti?cial datasets constructed in the bootstrap procedure just described. Finally, column 10 of Table 1 gives the (biweight) dispersion of the velocities about the best-?t sine in each annulus for comparison with the previous analyses of Cohen & Ryzhov (1997) and Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998). Figure 4 directly compares some of the ?ts from Table 1 against the data. The ?lled circles in this ?gure plot vp against Θ for our blue GCs, while the open circles correspond to the red clusters. The top panel shows the objects with 35′′ ≤ R < 125′′ ; the second panel is for those with 125′′ ≤ R < 207′′ ; the next panel includes clusters at 207′′ ≤ R < 297′′ ; the fourth is for GCs with 297′′ ≤ R < 380′′ ; the ?fth has 380′′ ≤ R < 414′′ ; and the sixth, 414′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ . In the top four panels, the solid curves trace the corresponding sine ?ts for the blue clusters, as summarized in Table 1, and the broken curves are the best-?t sinusoids for the red clusters. In both of the bottom two panels, the blue and red ?ts shown are those given in Table 1 for the annuli combined (i.e., for 380′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ ), as these are much more stable and less uncertain. In all cases, the observed vp (Θ) data appear to be consistent with the simple sinusoidal form that was assumed in our ?tting. Table 1 and Figure 4 hint at some interesting radial trends in the kinematics of the M87 GCS. First, it appears that the projected kinematics of the red and blue subsystems are, at least to ?rst order, rather similar. There are, however, suggestions of some di?erences which we shall return to below and in §5.7 where we discuss the two-dimensional velocity ?eld of the GCS. Second, although it is roughly constant over much of our range in projected radius, the velocity dispersion of the clusters (either about the sample mean vp or about the best-?t sine curve) shows some evidence for an increase at the largest R. This is just signi?cant at the 90% level in our sample (and not even then for the metal-rich subsystem), but it is actually predicted by the simple dynamical models we present in §4. Third, there is some evidence for a rise in the rotation amplitude ?R at large radii, although this is not formally signi?cant at the 90% level; to this degree of accuracy, the red and blue cluster samples both are consistent with a constant ?R ? 170 km s?1 at all radii 2.5 < ?R< ? 35 kpc (see Figure 8 below). On the other hand, the angle of the rotation axis, Θ0 , does change signi?cantly as a function

? E ? ET AL. COT

9

Table 1 Kinematics of the M87 Globular Cluster System R (arcsec) R (arcsec) R (kpc) N vp (km s?1 ) σp (km s?1 ) vsys (km s?1 ) Θ0 (? E of N) ?R (km s?1 ) σp,r (km s?1 )

Full sample: 278 clusters with 0.80 ≤ (C ? T1 ) ≤ 2.35 35–635 35–125 125–207 207–297 297–380 380–635 380–414 414–635 252 91 178 252 332 415 402 481 18.3 6.6 12.9 18.3 24.1 30.2 29.2 35.0 278 55 57 55 56 55 27 28
43 1335+ ? 41 74 1392+ ? 86 + 93 1282? 90 93 1269+ ?104 + 81 1311? 85 1445+130 ?129

401+ ? 318+ ? 366+ ? 409+ ? 332+ ? 543+ ?

27 30 37 60 66 82 67 79 44 53 73 88

42 1354+ ? 58 94 1379+ ? 68 + 63 1312?104 1248+129 ? 61 66 1375+ ?122 +154 1360?119

66+36 ?34 92+62 ?70 ?1+56 ?46 127+43 ?55 49+45 ?57 82+36 ?69 45+69 ?49 105+45 ?55

169+ ?

42 97

384+ ? 306+ ? 359+ ? 388+ ? 301+ ? 470+ ?

27 32 41 58 58 89 60 82 39 49 96 97

90+130 ?143 153+133 ?144 188+138 ?122 199+113 ?118 303+190 ?150 361+436 ?221 411+305 ?594

1324+204 ?203 1547+172 ?161

98 605+ ?136 + 93 460?114

1319+232 ?196 1381+214 ? 96

514+105 ?173 352+174 ?118

Metal-poor sample: 161 clusters with 0.80 ≤ (C ? T1 ) ≤ 1.42 35–635 35–125 125–207 207–297 297–380 380–635 380–414 414–635 260 98 185 250 334 414 404 480 18.9 7.1 13.5 18.2 24.3 30.1 29.4 34.9 161 26 33 33 31 38 19 19
58 1339+ ? 63

412+ ?

36 43

43 1375+ ? 92

59+50 ?53 77+76 ?75 ?37+58 ?54 136+45 ?52 37+31 ?55 76+46 ?64 63+75 ?77 94+29 ?45

51 172+ ?108

397+ ?

37 46

1355+126 ?111 1235+112 ?116 1325+134 ?143 1353+119 ?106 1433+166 ?172 1291+239 ?259 1559+263 ?183

58 300+ ? 88 + 96 350?108 83 447+ ?107 + 50 340? 71 81 531+ ?106

1375+109 ? 95 91 1277+ ?125 +180 1318? 93 36 1445+ ?164 +156 1346?152 1280+225 ?282 1406+199 ?140

85+260 ?166 162+210 ?229 270+181 ?182 253+126 ?141 322+229 ?175 313+476 ?337 443+316 ?252

47 288+ ?104 + 77 342?117 83 410+ ?120 + 43 295? 86 98 452+ ?128

600+126 ?235 71 412+ ?171

555+112 ?240 61 303+ ?153

Metal-rich sample: 117 clusters with 1.42 ≤ (C ? T1 ) ≤ 2.35 35–635 35–125 125–207 207–297 297–380 380–635 380–414 414–635
a

239 83 172 258 325 415 399 481

17.4 6.0 12.5 18.8 23.6 30.2 29.0 35.0

117 29 24 22 25 17 8 9

63 1331+ ? 66

385+ ?

49 51

93 1324+ ? 70

76+44 ?46 100+71 ?78 23+55 ?62 100+53 ?63 104+43 ?55 90+67 ?73 18+73 ?50 116+66 ?58

160+120 ? 99 93+178 ?256 193+205 ?246 183+195 ?115 174+306 ?199 289+441 ?595
487 667+ ?1000 + 973 200?1050

364+ ?

49 52

1415+137 ?121 1341+156 ?133 1199+131 ?137 1257+106 ?119 1499+207 ?275 1433+407 ?387 1512+284 ?287

70 325+ ? 95 + 95 378?138 79 344+ ?114 + 83 304?120 588+118 ?276

1379+153 ?116 1368+116 ?155 1174+139 ?116 1271+116 ?112 1357+324 ?232 1350a 1350a

61 319+ ?137 + 88 345?155 44 312+ ?138 + 55 268?141 477+187 ?270

583+114 ?442 568+196 ?568

314+112 ?314 432+360 ?432

Systemic velocity held ?xed in ?t of sine curve.

10

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

of radius, particularly among the blue clusters. This interesting phenomenon is discussed in more detail below. 3.3. Kinematic Properties as a Function of Projected Radius In order to better visualize these trends, and to address any concerns that our particular choice of bins in Table 1 might have in?uenced our results, Figures 5–8 show the line-of-sight mean velocity and dispersion, and the best-?t rotation axis and amplitude, as functions of projected radius for our full GC sample, and separately for each of the blue and red subsets. To construct these pro?les we slide a bin of ?xed radial width ?R = 90′′ ? 6.5 kpc through the GCS, centering the bin at the position of each of our measured GCs in turn and computing the kinematics (including bootstrap estimates of con?dence intervals) for all clusters lying within ±(?R)/2 of that point. We begin at small projected radii when the number of clusters per bin ?rst exceeds 15 (so that the ?ts can be usefully constrained) and we stop at large R when the sample size per bin drops below this limit. Clearly, most of the points plotted in these ?gures are not statistically independent—only points separated by at least the full ?R = 6.5 kpc (the size of the horizontal bar drawn in each middle panel) can be—and we do not attempt any sort of formal ?ts to these pro?les. Nevertheless, this procedure is useful since it provides a more detailed (albeit smoothed) view of radial trends than can be had with a single binning such as that in Table 1. It is also important to note that this method of smoothing the data is di?erent than that employed by Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998) and Cohen (2000). These authors opt instead to ?t the kinematics in a series of annuli that always enclose the same number of data points, and which therefore (because neither the intrinsic spatial distribution of the GCS nor the observational sampling of it is uniform) have a variable radial width (for an illustration of this point, see Figure 2 of Cohen 2000). Our approach avoids the nontrivial di?culty of interpreting data that have been smoothed by di?erent amounts from point to point, and it yields a more accurate, though necessarily less precise, depiction of radial variations in kinematics at the low-density, large-radius limits of our GC sample. The mean velocity in Figure 5, which makes no allowance or corrections for rotation, shows no signi?cant variations with radius until roughly R > ? 30 kpc. The sharp apparent rise in vp at this radius is due — as Figure 2 and the bottom of Figure 4 both show, and as Romanowsky & Kochanek (2000) also suggested — to sparse sampling of a population that shows signi?cant rotation: the few GCs in our radial-velocity sample at these large radii have been drawn mostly from positions around the photometric major axis of M87 (at 155? East of North), where the rotation produces line-of-sight velocities furthest from the true systemic velocity of the galaxy and the GCS. Fitting a sine curve to quantify the rotation at every radius takes this e?ect into account, and a plot of vsys vs. R (cf. eq. [6]) is essentially ?at, and consistent with a

Fig. 5.— Upper Panel: Biweight estimates for the mean line-of-sight velocity of the M87 globular cluster system, as a function of distance from galaxy center (?lled circles). Thin and thick solid lines show the 68% and 90% con?dence limits on v , estimated using a bootstrap technique as described in the text. Points represent the systemic velocity measured in radial bins of constant width ?R ≡ 90′′ ? 6.5 kpc (indicated by the error bar in the middle panel). The broken horizontal line indicates the mean velocity recorded in Table 1 for clusters at all radii 35′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ . Middle Panel: Same as above, but for the sample of metal-poor (blue) clusters. Lower Panel: As above, but for the sample of metal-rich (red) clusters.

? E ? ET AL. COT

11

Fig. 6.— Upper Panel: Biweight estimates for the velocity dispersion of the M87 globular cluster system as a function of galactocentric distance. Solid points denote the dispersion σp about the sample mean in each bin, taken from Figure 5. Open circles represent the dispersion σp,r about the best-?tting sine curve in each case (parameters taken from Figures 7 and 8). Solid curves delimit the 68% and 90% con?dence bands for σp , obtained from a numerical bootstrap. Horizontal line is at the value determined for the full sample of clusters with 35′′ ≤ R ≤ 635′′ . Middle Panel: As above, but for the sample of metal-poor (blue) globular clusters. Lower Panel: As above, for the sample of metal-rich (red) clusters.

constant vsys ≡ 1350 km s?1 . The velocity dispersion pro?les in Figure 6 show both the biweight rms scatter, σp , about the direct mean of the sample in each bin (solid points) and the biweight dispersion, σp,r , about the best-?tting sine curve (open circles). At relatively small projected radii R ? 10–15 kpc, the red clusters may be dynamically somewhat “hotter” than the blue clusters in M87, and the situation may be reversed at larger radii. As was mentioned above, however, in connection with Table 1, these apparent di?erences are not statistically signi?cant. However, in agreement with previous studies (e.g., Cohen & Ryzhov 1997), we do see evidence for a rising velocity dispersion towards larger radii — a trend that is more clearly established for our blue clusters than for the red ones. Figures 7 and 8 — which show the rotation-axis position angle and apparent rotation amplitude as functions of projected radius in the M87 GCS — present the most substantial new result of this empirical part of our analysis and constitute a point of clear departure from earlier studies. These pro?les were obtained by ?tting equation (6) to the vp (Θ) data in our sliding radial bin, with vsys ≡ 1350 km s?1 held ?xed but with Θ0 and ?R both allowed to vary. The most striking point relates to the blue clusters, which appear (see Figure 7) to rotate about the projected major axis of M87 (Θ0 = ?25? E of N) in the inner regions of the system, R < ? 16–18 kpc, but then switch to the the more conventional minor-axis ? rotation (Θ0 = 65 E of N) that they show for R > ? 20 kpc. Given the smoothing kernel that we have applied to the data (again, ?R = 90′′ ? 6.5 kpc, as illustrated in the middle panel of Figure 7), this 90-degree ?ip in Θ0 seems to be almost instantaneous. It is probably no accident that it appears to coincide with the onset, at R ? 19 kpc, of the cD envelope in the starlight (de Vaucouleurs & Nieto 1978; Carter & Dixon 1978) and the GCS of M87 (McLaughlin, Harris, & Hanes 1993). Figures 7 and 8 also reveal that the rotation axis of the red clusters seems to show a gradual drift towards the ? photometric major axis of M87 for R < ? 18 kpc before it “corrects” to a constant Θ0 ? 65 at larger radii. It is not clear, however, that this apparent di?erence in the small-R behavior of the red and blue GCs is statistically signi?cant — even at the 68% con?dence level. We return to this issue in §5 below, where the two-dimensional rotation ?elds of the metal-poor and metal-rich GC samples are discussed within the context of the larger Virgo cluster environment. Figure 8 shows the rotation amplitude corresponding to each ?tted value of Θ0 in Figure 7. As was suggested above, it is di?cult to discriminate between a ?at rotation curve and one which rises with increasing radius. For instance, there is some evidence for an outward rise in ?R for R > ? 25 kpc, for the red and blue GCs alike, but this e?ect sets in roughly where the azimuthal coverage of our radial-velocity sample begins to decline (see Figures 2 and 4), and it is signi?cant at just the 68% con?dence level. Also, note that the dashed curve drawn in all three panels of Figure 8 shows the circular velocity of the M87/Virgo potential in which the GCs are orbiting [vc (r) = {GM (r)/r}1/2 ; see eq. (11) below for our

12

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 7.— Upper Panel: Projected azimuth of the rotation axis of the full M87 globular cluster system, as a function of projected galactocentric radius (points). Thin and thick solid lines de?ne 68% and 90% con?dence bands. In this ?gure, and the following one, the systemic velocity was held ?xed at vsys ≡ 1350 km s?1 (see Table 1). The upper and lower horizontal lines indicate position angles of the projected major (Θ0 = ?25? ) and minor (Θ0 = 65? ) axes of M87. Middle Panel: For the metal-poor (blue) globular clusters. Lower Panel: For the metal-rich (red) globular clusters.

adopted mass model]. The fact that ?R appears to approach this limit at our largest sampled radii suggests that the sparser spatial coverage there may be biasing our results to some extent; it may also provide some evidence that the M87 GCS is being viewed nearly edge-on, as any inclination correction is likely to be small if the apparent ?R is already so near vc (r). One other point worthy of note in these ?R pro?les is the apparent dip to nearly 0 at radii R ? 14–18 kpc. This may simply be an artifact of smoothing the data, rather than an indication of any real feature in the intrinsic velocity ?eld of the GCS. Since Θ0 appears to change very suddenly by roughly 90? at some radius in this range, it is conceivable that the 6.5-kpc wide annular bins centered on points in this part of the GCS are simply combining two distinct samples of clusters, rotating about essentially orthogonal axes, whose sinusoidal vp (Θ) dependences interfere destructively and average out to a lower amplitude of apparent rotation. Using the spectroscopic metallicities of Cohen, Blakeslee, & Ryzhov (1998), Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998) attempted to distinguish between metal-poor and metal-rich clusters in their study of the rotation properties of the M87 GCS. They concluded that the blue clusters showed essentially no rotation, ?R ? 0, for small radii R < ? 15 kpc. However, they ?xed Θ0 at about 30? E of N in their analysis, and solved only for the amplitude when ?tting sines to their vp (Θ) data. The di?erence between their result and ours for the blue-GCS rotation amplitude stems from the fact that we have found Θ0 at small R to be far away (i.e., approaching 90? ) from the position angle adopted by Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998). The acquisition of still more radial velocities for M87 GCs will be important in con?rming our ?ndings and in clarifying and quantifying any dichotomies that might exist in the blue vs. red kinematics. Meanwhile, the surprisingly complicated rotation ?eld that we have uncovered demands the development of sophisticated dynamical models of the GCS. In particular, although we proceed in the next Section with a standard, one-dimensional Jeans-equation analysis of velocity moments in the M87 GCS, we recognize that we cannot hope thereby to account rigorously for the dynamical e?ects of rotation. In fact, in this analysis we shall neglect rotation altogether, treating it as a perturbation to be addressed in future studies. Figure 9 roughly quanti?es the e?ect this choice may have on our results by comparing the rotation amplitude of the M87 GCS to its line-of-sight velocity dispersion, both about the sample mean (?lled circles) and about the best-?t sine (open circles), at every projected radius. The ratio of the two is essentially constant with projected radius, holding at a level of about 0.45 for the GCS as a whole and for the metal-poor and metal-rich subsamples individually. Thus, rotation enters as a correction at the (?R/σp )2 ? 20% level in the Jeans-equation analysis that we shall pursue below and, thus, at this exploratory stage, is a relatively small source of uncertainty.

? E ? ET AL. COT
4. DYNAMICAL MODELS

13

In the absence of rotation and the approximation of spherical symmetry, the fundamental equation of our dynamical analysis is the spherical Jeans equation (e.g., Binney & Tremaine 1987): GMtot (r) 2 βcl d 2 2 , ncl σr + ncl σr = ?ncl dr r r2 (7)

where ncl (r) is the volume density pro?le of the GCS, σr (r) is its velocity dispersion in the radial direction, and βcl (r) ≡ 2 2 1 ? σθ /σr is a measure of its velocity anisotropy.21 The tendency in previous studies along these lines has been to use the projected velocity dispersions of the GCs to infer the intrinsic σr (r) and thus to constrain the total, “background” gravitating mass pro?le Mtot (r). To do so, however, requires some a priori assumptions on the anisotropy pro?le, βcl (r), and typically this has meant adopting the simplest case of isotropic orbits with βcl ≡ 0 (see, e.g., Cohen & Ryzhov 1997). By contrast, Romanowsky & Kochanek (2000) apply a technique in which an ad hoc functional form of Mtot (r) is assumed a priori, and the observed σp (R) is used in conjunction with sophisticated orbit modelling to constrain both the normalization of the M87/Virgo mass pro?le and the behavior of βcl (r) in the GCS. This latter procedure is closer in spirit to ours here, in which we specify both ncl (r) and Mtot (r) in full, and then use the observed σp (R) pro?les of §3 to infer something about the anisotropy of the GC orbits in M87, both globally—for our entire sample—and separately—for the metal-poor and metal-rich populations. One way to do this is as an ’inverse problem’ (e.g. Merritt & Oh 1997). In this approach, the observed function σp (R) is approximated in some model-independent way (e.g., via splines). For an assumed Mtot (r), the two unknown functions σr (r) and β (r) then follow uniquely from the Jeans equation and the deprojection integral. But given the limited number of velocities in our sample—to say nothing of our neglect of rotation and our assumption of spherical symmetry—we opt instead to construct a suite of model σp (R) pro?les by specifying βcl (r) a priori, and then comparing these models with the data to gain a broad, qualitative view of the orbital properties of the M87 GCS. Formally, we solve equation (7) for σr (r): ∞ 1 2βcl 2βcl GMtot 2 (r) = σr exp exp ? dr dx dx . (8) ncl 2 ncl (r) r x x r
21 Considerations

of symmetry imply that the two tangential velocity dispersions are equal, i.e., σθ = σφ .

Fig. 8.— Upper Panel: Amplitude of projected rotation as a function of galactocentric radius in the M87 globular cluster system (?lled circles), shown with 68% and 90% con?dence bands (thin and thick solid lines). The position angle, Θ0 , of the rotation axis was allowed to vary with radius in the sinusoidal ?ts (see Figure 7), but the systemic velocity was held ?xed at vsys ≡ 1350 km s?1 (see Table 1). Upper horizontal (dash-dot) line is placed at the amplitude ?R = 169 km s?1 found by ?tting to the entire sample of globular clusters, over all radii (see Table 1). Dotted curve shows the circular velocity as a function of radius in the M87/Virgo gravitational potential, vc (r ) = [GM (r )/r ]1/2 . Middle Panel: As above, but for the sample of metal-poor (blue) clusters. Lower Panel: As above, but for the sample of metal-rich (red) clusters.

14

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 9.— Upper Panel: Ratio of the projected rotation amplitude in Figure 8 to the line-of-sight velocity dispersion in Figure 6. Solid points compare ?R to the biweight dispersion σp about the mean velocity vp at each radius, and the solid lines trace the 68% and 90% con?dence limits on the ratio. Open points come from comparing ?R to the biweight dispersion σp,r about the best-?tting sine curve at each radius. For clarity, the con?dence bands for this second ratio are not shown. The upper horizontal line marks the average of (?R)/σp = 0.45 suggested by a ?t to all cluster in our sample, regardless of radius (see Table 1). Middle Panel: As above, but for the metal-poor (blue) globular clusters. Lower Panel: As above, for the metal-rich (red) globular cluster system.

With σr (r) in hand, the projected velocity dispersion pro?le, σp (R), then follows from the standard integral
2 σp (R) =

2 Ncl (R)

∞ R 2 ncl σr (r) 1 ? βcl

R2 r2

where the projected GCS density Ncl (R) is given by equation (3). We also compute the cumulative, aperture velocity dispersion pro?le, de?ned to be the rms line-of-sight velocity for all clusters inside a given radius:
R 2 σap (≤ R 2 Ncl (R)σp (R) R dR 0 0 ?1

r dr √ , r 2 ? R2

(9)

R) =

Ncl (R) R dR

.

(10)

This statistic has the obvious advantage of reduced noise in the measured dispersion at large radii, although its interpretation can be somewhat more complicated since it re?ects a coarse average (and progressively more so as R increases) of a spatially varying quantity. To proceed in this way, we require accurate descriptions of: (1) the total gravitating mass pro?le in M87 (and, as the projection integrals above make clear, in the Virgo Cluster beyond our last observed galactocentric radius); and (2) the spatial distribution of the full M87 GCS and of the blue and red clusters, ncl (r), individually. First, we take Mtot (r) directly from McLaughlin (1999a), who has developed a simple mass model for M87 and Virgo that satis?es all observational constraints imposed by the optical surface photometry of the galaxy (as a tracer of the stellar mass density; de Vaucouleurs & Nieto 1978) by the X-ray surface brightness on R < ? 200–kpc scales in the core of the cluster (used under the assumption that the hot intracluster gas around M87 is in hydrostatic equilibrium with the total mass distribution; Nulsen & B¨ ohringer 1995), and by the spatial distribution and line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the early-type (mostly dE) Virgo galaxies out to scales of ? 3 Mpc (Binggeli et al. 1985; Girardi et al. 1996). We emphasize that because this model for Mtot (r) was constructed explicitly without any reference to GCS data, it is completely separate from, and independent of, our radial-velocity observations. Thus, the total (baryonic and dark) mass interior to any three-dimensional radius r in Virgo is taken to be, with normalizations appropriate for a distance of 15 Mpc to the cluster, Mtot (r) Mstars (r) Mdark (r) = = = Mstars (r) + Mdark (r) 1.67 8.10 × 1011 M⊙ [(r/5.1 kpc)/(1 + r/5.1 kpc)] 14 7.06 × 10 M⊙ [ln(1 + r/560 kpc) ? (r/560 kpc)/(1 + r/560 kpc)] . (11)

? E ? ET AL. COT

15

Note that this model attributes all of the dark matter around M87 to the Virgo Cluster as a whole; all of the available data are consistent with this minimalist hypothesis, in which M87 as a galaxy has no dark matter halo of its own (see McLaughlin 1999a). The functional form of Mdark (r) is that expected for the “universal” dark-matter halo of Navarro, Frenk, & White (1997), in which the volume density scales as ρdark ? r?1 (rs + r)?2 , with a ?tted value of rs = 560 kpc. The adopted models for Mstars (r), Mdark (r) and Mtot (r) are illustrated in Figure 10. Next, Figure 11 motivates our favored model for the density pro?le of the full M87 GCS. This plot, which is taken nearly in full from McLaughlin (1999b) and which is described in detail there, shows the volume mass densities of the stars in M87 (obtained by applying a spatially constant mass-to-light ratio to the optical surface photometry of M87), the GCs around the galaxy (obtained by combining number counts from a number of di?erent studies and applying a geometrical de-projection algorithm), and the hot, X-ray emitting gas in the core of Virgo (obtained in a modelindependent way from ROSAT observations, by Nulsen & B¨ ohringer 1995). The dash-dot line running through the gas datapoints is directly proportional to the density pro?le of the dark-matter halo just discussed — i.e., it shows that ρgas ∝ ρdark ∝ (r/560 kpc)?1 (1 + r/560 kpc)?2 in Virgo (see McLaughlin 1999a). The GC density data in Figure 11 have been scaled up by a factor of 1/0.0026 ? 385 to illustrate that, beyond a radius of r ≈ 7 kpc (the e?ective radius of the M87 starlight in projection) a strict proportionality ties the density of the GCS to that of the other baryons: ρcl (r) = 0.0026 [ρstars (r) + ρgas (r)]. The constant of this proportionality, 0.0026, appears to hold similarly in nearly 100 other early-type galaxies, and it has been interpreted by McLaughlin (1999b) as a universal e?ciency of GC formation. Thus, for radii r > ? 100 kpc, where there are no direct observations of the GCS density pro?le, we assume that ρcl (r) ? 0.0026ρgas(r) ∝ ρdark (r). Inside this, we adopt an ad hoc functional ?t to the GCS density data from McLaughlin (1999b). In total, we posit that ntot (r) ∝ ∝ (r/9.1 kpc)?1 (1 + r/9.1 kpc)?2 , r < 95 kpc (r/560 kpc)?1 (1 + r/560 kpc)?2 , r > 95 kpc . (12)

The normalization of this model, which is drawn as the bold, dashed line in Figure 11, is unimportant for our purposes (see eq. [8]). The observed proportionality between the GC and gas density pro?les has some important implications for the debate over whether some or all of the GCs surrounding M87 are intergalactic in nature (White 1987; West et al. 1995; Harris et al. 1998). We shall return to this issue in §5.7. Figure 12 shows the projection of this density model as a bold solid line. (The mass surface density Σ is related to ρ in the same way as the projected number density N is related to n.) The small triangles are the observed surface densities, again taken from McLaughlin (1999b), that were de-projected to provide the volume densities in Figure 11. We have now

Fig. 10.— Mass model for the central regions of the Virgo cluster, adopted from McLaughlin (1999a). The solid curve shows the total mass pro?le: i.e., the combined Virgo cluster dark matter distribution (as traced by the x-ray emitting gas) and that of the stellar component of M87, indicated by the dashed and dotted curves, respectively. See §4 and equation (11) for details. The vertical arrow shows the projected radius where the cD enevelope of M87 begins.

16

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 11.— Comparison of the (mass) volume density pro?les of the globular cluster system (?lled circles and bold dashed line), halo stars (thin dashed line) and X-ray gas (open squares and dot-dash line) around M87 (after McLaughlin 1999b). Note that ρcl has been scaled upward by the factor 1/0.0026 (see text). The solid line is the sum of the stellar and gas densities, which have been calculated by de-projecting the galaxy surface photometry with the algorithm of McLaughlin (1999b). The vertical arrow marks the projected e?ective radius of the galaxy light, Rr? = 96′′ ? 7 kpc (de Vaucouleurs & Nieto 1978). Beyond this, it is found that ρcl ∝ (ρstars + ρgas ).

also used our new CT1 photometry to measure the surface density pro?les, not only for the complete GC sample, but also for the metal-poor and metal-rich samples separately. To do so, our initial catalog of point sources was ?rst trimmed to exclude all objects having T1 ≤ 21, C?T1 ≤ 0.8, and C?T1 ≥ 2.35, leaving us with a sample of 2130 candidate GCs. The adopted limiting magnitude was chosen to ensure that our photometric catalog is complete over the full range in galactocentric radius (see Geisler, Lee & Kim 2001). A background surface density of 0.8 clusters arcmin?2 was then subtracted to give the surface density pro?le for the entire cluster population. This background level was chosen based on a comparison of our surface density pro?le with the calibrated surface density pro?le of McLaughlin (1999b), and agrees to ? 5% with that predicted by the Galactic star count model of Bahcall & Soneira (1981). The ?nal, blue-plus-red pro?le is shown as the open circles in Figure 12, where it has been scaled vertically to match the counts from McLaughlin (1999b) and shows good agreement with that independent measurement of Σcl (R). For the separate metal-rich and metal-poor samples, we have taken the background surface densities to be exactly half that of the total background in our CT1 sample. Though somewhat arbitrary, these choices of backgrounds are consistent with the color distribution of foreground stars predicted by Ratnatunga & Bahcall (1985) for three Galactic GCs having Galactic latitudes and longitudes similar to M87. This approach is obviously inferior to measuring surface densities directly from background ?elds, but the precise choice of backgrounds has relatively little e?ect on the ?nal surface density pro?les, except in the outermost bins. The resulting distributions for the metal-rich and metal-poor cluster populations are indicated by the open squares and circled points in Figure 12. This shows quite clearly that the metal-poor clusters in M87 follow a much more shallow radial pro?le than their metal-rich counterparts, consistent with earlier ?ndings based on HST imaging in the central regions of the galaxy (e.g., Neilsen, Tsvetanov & Ford 1999). There is no reasonable choice of background that can alter this basic conclusion. Even if we were to make the highly implausible assumption that the background consists entirely of sources having colors of C?T1 ≤ 1.42, this qualitative contrast between the blue and red GCSs would remain. A more detailed discussion of the spatial distribution of the M87 GCS will be presented in Geisler, Lee & Kim (2001); our purposes only require estimations of the overall shapes of nblue (r) and nred (r). To obtain these, we project models similar in form to that in equation (12) and ?t to the blue- and red-GCS data points in Figure 12. We obtain nblue (r) ∝ (r/20.5 kpc)?1 (1 + r/20.5 kpc)?2 , r < 95 kpc ∝ (r/560 kpc)?1 (1 + r/560 kpc)?2 , r > 95 kpc , (13)

? E ? ET AL. COT

17

Fig. 12.— Surface density pro?les, Σ(R), for globular clusters associated with M87. Triangles show the surface density pro?le of McLaughlin (1999b) for the full globular cluster system, while open circles show the pro?le found here using the Washington photometry described in Paper I. Circled points and open squares indicate the respective surface density pro?les of metal-poor (blue) and metal-rich (red) globular clusters. The bold curves correspond to projections of the models in equations (12)–(14) in the text; see the discussion there for details.

and

nred (r)

∝ ∝

(r/3.3 kpc)?1 (1 + r/3.3 kpc)?2 , r < 125 kpc (r/560 kpc)?1 (1 + r/560 kpc)?2 , r > 125 kpc .

(14)

Figures 13–15 show the results of this exercise applied to our three GCS samples. In each ?gure, the top panel shows the observed σp (R) pro?le computed by smoothing the data with a radial kernel of ?xed width 120′′ ? 8.2 kpc (rather than the 90′′ used for Figure 6). Also shown are the 90% con?dence bands, obtained by bootstrapping as described in §3. The bottom panels show the aperture velocity dispersion and bootstrap estimates of the 90% con?dence bands for the cluster color ranges indicated. Overlaid on the data in every case are the model curves predicted by substituting equations (11)–(15) in equations (8)–(10). We emphasize that these theoretical velocity dispersion pro?les have not been ?t to the data: with Mtot (r), ncl (r), and βcl all speci?ed a priori, there are no additional parameters to be adjusted. Note that the rising velocity dispersion pro?le seen in Figure 6 is once again evident here — not only in the measured σp (R) and σap (R) pro?les, but also in the models. This predicted rise in σp (R) and σap (R) comes about because the background mass density pro?le given by equation 11, and shown in Figure 10, is shallower at these radii than that of an isothermal sphere. It is clear from Figure 13 that the M87 GCS as a whole has an almost perfectly isotropic velocity ellipsoid. Models with even modest amounts of anisotropy, βcl = ±0.4, produce noticeably inferior matches to observed velocity dispersions, while
22 It is worth emphasizing that these values of β are best interpreted as density-weighted averages due to our assumption of spatially constant cl anisotropies.

The projections of these best-?t models are drawn as the bold, broken lines in Figure 12. Their absolute normalization is again unimportant for us, although their relative normalization does matter. This has been set so that nblue /nred → 4, independent of radius in the limit r → ∞. The projected sum of these red and blue models is shown in Figure 12 as the thin solid line, which is reasonably compatible with the completely independent projection of ntot (r) from equation (12). With speci?cations for the Virgo mass pro?le Mtot (r) and for the density pro?les ncl (r) of the total, blue, and red GCSs thus in hand, we solve equations (8)–(10) for ?ve di?erent spatially constant values of the GCS orbital anisotropy βcl 22 ? 2 2 +0.99 (σθ /σr = 0.01, radial bias) ? ? 2 2 ? ? +0.4 (σθ /σr = 0.6, radial bias) 0 (σθ = σφ = σr , isotropic) (15) βcl ≡ ? 2 2 ? ? 0 . 4 ( σ /σ = 1 . 4 , tangential bias) ? r θ ? 2 2 ?99 (σθ /σr = 100, tangential bias) .

18

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 13.— Upper Panel: Velocity dispersion pro?le for the complete sample of globular clusters. Points represent biweight estimates for the line-of-sight velocity dispersion in radial bins of width ?R = 120′′ ? 8.7 kpc; thin solid curves show bootstrap estimates of the 90% con?dence limits on these measurements. The thick solid line shows the predicted velocity dispersion pro?le for a system of test particles that are embedded in the potential de?ned by equation (11), follow a density pro?le given by equation (12) (the bold, dashed line in Figure 11), and have an isotropic velocity ellipsoid (βcl ≡ 0). From top to bottom, the four dashed curves show the predicted velocity dispersion pro?les for βcl ≡ +0.99 (a strong radial bias), βcl ≡ +0.4 (a moderate radial bias), βcl ≡ ?0.4 (a moderate tangential bias) and βcl ≡ ?99 (a strong tangential bias). Lower Panel: Aperture velocity dispersion pro?le for the complete sample of globular clusters, with bootstrap estimates of the 90% con?dence limits illustrated by thin solid lines. The heavy solid curve shows the predicted aperture velocity dispersion pro?les for the case of isotropic orbits, while the four dashed curves show model predictions with the same velocity anisotropies as in the above panel.

strongly tangentially biased orbits (βcl = ?99) can be ruled out with > 90% con?dence and very radial orbits (βcl = 0.99) are altogether out of the question. However, if the cluster sample is divided on the basis of metallicity, some interesting di?erences emerge. Figure 14 suggests a modest tangential bias in the metal-poor clusters, with βcl ? ?0.4 at small radii (corresponding to σθ ? 1.2σr ), perhaps tending towards isotropy at larger radii ?20–30 kpc. The opposite result is seen for the metal-rich GCs, which have a slight radial bias of roughly the same magnitude: Figure 15 suggests βcl ? +0.4, and thus σθ ? 0.8σr . This is just what is needed, of course, to balance the anisotropy in the blue GCS and produce the isotropy indicated for the combined sample in Figure 13. Qualitatively speaking, these contrasting anisotropies are also what might have been expected a priori, given the fact that the blue GCS has a much shallower density pro?le than the red subsystem, even though the two populations are embedded in the same gravitational potential and show no signi?cant di?erences in their projected kinematics (see Figure 6). Romanowsky & Kochanek (2000) have derived a βcl (r) pro?le for the total GCS — i.e., they did not separate their velocity sample on the basis of metallicity. At small radii, the implied βcl is markedly negative, thereby implying a substantial tangential bias for the GCS. However, this claim ultimately rests on their assumption that the background potential of M87/Virgo is distributed as a singular isothermal sphere, Mtot (r) ∝ r, whereas the true Mtot (r) in the core of Virgo is well constrained (principally by X-ray data; see Nulsen & B¨ ohringer 1995 and McLaughlin 1999a; see also Figure 10) to grow substantially more rapidly than this with increasing radius. Said another way, the density distribution of the gravitating mass in the core of Virgo is signi?cantly shallower than the ρ ∝ r?2 distribution of an isothermal sphere, and therefore the density distribution of the central GCS does not require so large a tangential bias as Romanowsky & Kochanek (2000) found necessary to satisfy the Jeans equation. Finally, we consider the e?ect on our results if our adopted extrapolation of the GCS density pro?les in Figure 12 and equations (12)–(14) is somehow in error. It seems unlikely that the GC distribution could become shallower than the hot intracluster gas (and the dark matter) in Virgo, and thus Figures 16 and 17 explore the implications of an ncl (r) that drops o? very steeply towards large radii. Rather than requiring ncl (r) ∝ ρgas (r) at the unobserved r > ? 100 kpc, then, we take at face value simple ?ts to our CT1 density pro?les for 5 < ?R< ? 30 kpc and assume nblue (r) ∝ (r/21.3 kpc)?1 (1 + r/21.3 kpc)?2 , all radii (16)

? E ? ET AL. COT

19

Fig. 14.— Same as Figure 13, except for the sample of metal-poor (blue) globular clusters. Note that the aperture velocity dispersion at small radii in the lower panel falls below that expected in the case of isotropic orbits, at the 90% con?dence level. The model which best matches the measured pro?le has βcl ≈ ?0.4, corresponding to a tangential bias of σθ ≈ 1.2σr .

Fig. 15.— Same as Figure 13, except for the sample of metal-rich (red) globular clusters. In this case, the aperture velocity dispersion pro?le at large radii in the lower panel lies above that expected for an isotropic velocity ellipsoid. A model which reasonably matches the measured pro?le has βcl ≈ +0.4, corresponding to a radial bias of σθ ≈ 0.8σr .

20

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 16.— Alternate extrapolation of the red and blue globular cluster system density pro?les to larger, unobserved radii (compare with Figure 12). Thin, solid line is the sum of the red and blue ?ts (shown as thick lines) and is in good agreement with the independently observed density pro?le of the full globular cluster system.

and

The bold, broken lines in Figure 16 compares the projection of these functions to the same data considered in Figure 12. The thin, solid line, which shows the sum of the red and blue projected densities, is again in good agreement with the independently observed density distribution of the full GCS. We use these new density pro?les with the same Mtot (r) from equation (11) and the same ?ve constant βcl values from equation (15) to compute new models for the σp (R) and σap (≤ R) of the metal-poor and the metal-rich components of the GCS. Figure 17 compares these to the data, which again have been smoothed with a 120′′ -wide sliding radial bin and are shown with bootstrap estimates of their 90% con?dence bands. Because the large-r density gradient of both cluster subsystems has been made steeper by hypothesis without changing any other aspect of the dynamical models, the data would appear now to suggest a move towards substantial radial bias in orbits of both blue and red clusters at the largest radii covered here. We stress, however, that we regard this particular scenario as a very extreme possibility, as the GCS density pro?les postulated earlier are certainly closer to the truth. For instance, if ncl (r) indeed behaves as in Figure 16 rather than as in Figure 12, then we must conclude that the GC-to-baryon mass ratio of 0.0026 is only coincidentally realized, and then over a limited range of radius, in M87 — even though this “universal” ratio matches precisely what is found by McLaughlin (1999b) for nearly 100 other early-type galaxies. In any case, Figure 17 also shows that the GC volume density pro?les cannot fall o? more rapidly than roughly ncl ∝ r?3 , since this gradient already requires the clusters at large r to have nearly purely radial velocity ellipsoids in order to reproduce the observed line-of-sight velocity dispersion.
5. DISCUSSION

nred (r) ∝ (r/3.3 kpc)?1 (1 + r/3.3 kpc)?2 ,

all radii.

(17)

5.1. Results for other Ellipticals from Globular Clusters Before turning our attention to the various models which have been proposed for the formation of GCSs and their host galaxies, we pause ?rst to compare our ?ndings for the GCS of M87 with those of other elliptical galaxies. Perhaps the most natural comparison is that of M49, the most luminous member of the Virgo cluster, whose GCS has been studied recently by Sharples et al. (1998) and Zepf et al. (2000). From a sample of 144 GCs with measured velocities, Zepf et al. (2000) report that the metal-poor and metal-rich GCSs have di?erent dynamical properties: i.e., vrot /σ ? 0.3 and 0.1, respectively (with vrot /σ < 0.56 and 0.34 at 99% con?dence). These estimates are to be compared with the value of vrot /σ ? 0.45 which we measure for both components in M87. Hui et al. (1995) have analysed the radial velocities of

? E ? ET AL. COT

21

433 planetary nebulae (PNe) and 62 globular clusters in NGC 5128, and conclude that the metal-rich GCs in that galaxy show roughly the same dynamical properties as do the PNe, vrot /σ ? 0.3, whereas the metal-poor GCs show no evidence of rotation. Meanwhile, Kissler-Patig et al. (1999) ?nd some marginal evidence for rotation among the outermost GCs in NGC 1399, the central elliptical in Fornax, but due to the limited size of their radial velocity sample, were unable to ascertain if the chemically distinct GC populations di?er in their dynamical properties. Thus, at this early stage, no obvious pattern in the dynamical properties of the GCSs of elliptical galaxies has yet emerged. 5.2. Results for other Ellipticals from Planetary Nebulae Radial velocity surveys of PNe represent an alternative, and complementary, method of studying the halo dynamics of giant elliptical galaxies. While there have been no dynamical studies of the PNe population of M87 itself, some comparisons are possible for the three luminous early-type galaxies having large numbers of measured PNe radial velocities: NGC 5128 (Hui et al. 1995), NGC 4406 (Arnaboldi et al. 1996) and NGC 1316 (Arnaboldi et al. 1998). The PNe in all three galaxies show evidence for signi?cant rotation, vrot /σ ? 0.5-1, in their outer regions. In this respect, these galaxies resemble M87 which has (?R)/σ ? 0.5 from its GCS, with some evidence for slightly lower values in the inner regions of the galaxy and an outward increase in (?R)/σ . Moreover, integrated-light spectroscopy in the inner regions of these galaxies reveals little or no rotation in each case, similar to the situation for luminous elliptical galaxies, and for M87 in particular (e.g., vrot,? /σ? < ? 0.1 according to Davies & Birkinshaw 1988). On the other hand, none of these galaxies has the generally round and smooth photometric appearance of M87: NGC 5128 and NGC 1316 are clear examples of recent gas-rich mergers or accretions (e.g., Schweizer 1980), and NGC 4406 is probably best classi?ed as an S0 galaxy (Arnaboldi et al. 1996). While ?rm conclusions must await the measurement of radial velocities for PNe in the vicinity of M87, our results for the M87 GCS appear consistent with the claim of Arnaboldi et al. (1998) that giant elliptical galaxies, by virtue of their relatively rapid rotation at large radii, may contain roughly as much angular momentum per unit mass as do spiral galaxies assuming that the GC and PNe kinematics are representative of the kinematics of the underlying galaxy mass. 5.3. The GCS Velocity Ellipsoid at Small Galactocentric Radii It has been known for some time that the surface density pro?le of the GCs surrounding M87 exhibits a “core” of radius Rc ? 4-5 kpc (Lauer & Kormendy 1985; McLaughlin 1995). The possibility that this core developed as a result of GC destruction through tidal shocks from a central bulge or black-hole, or from an underlying triaxial potential, has been explored by many investigators (e.g., Ostriker, Binney & Saha 1989; Pesce, Capuzzo-Dolcetta & Vietri 1992). These authors also noted that such processes are expected to lead to a preponderance of tube orbits among the surviving GCs

Fig. 17.— Model vs. observed dispersion pro?les, shown separately for the blue and red subsets of the M87 globular cluster system, assuming the alternate density pro?les shown in Figure 16 and described by equations (16) and (17). Since the mass pro?le of M87/Virgo is ?xed in this analysis, the data in this case prefer models with stronger radial bias in the globular cluster system orbits at large galactocentric radii. Curves shown have constant β = 0.99, 0.4, 0, ?0.4 and ?99, as in Figures 13–15.)

22

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

relative to the initial sample. Moreover, in the speci?c case of the Galactic GCS, Murali & Weinberg (1997) have shown that GCs on eccentric orbits will undergo the most rapid relaxation and evaporation due to enhanced tidal heating; the preferential destruction of such clusters will therefore lead to an orbital distribution which becomes more tangentially biased with time. Thus, depending of course on the initial shape of the GCS velocity ellipsoid, the tangential bias which we ?nd for the GCs at small galactocentric radii — especially within an e?ective radius (see Figures 13–15) — may provide evidence that these dynamical processes have played a role in shaping the presently observed GCS. 5.4. Cooling Flow Models Fabian, Nulsen & Canizares (1984) were the ?rst to propose that the populous GCSs associated with some cD galaxies might be the signature of GC formation through cooling ?ows from their X-ray halos. A number of di?culties with this scenario have been raised over the years: e.g., most “high-SN ” and/or cooling-?ow galaxies show no evidence for young clusters, the GCs are generally more metal-de?cient than the intracluster gas, and it is unclear how the cooling gas might condense into clumps of mass ? 105 M⊙ . For M87, which is both an incipient cD galaxy and the prototypical “high–SN ” system, we may now add another di?culty to this list: as described in §4, the orbits of the surrounding GCs are closely isotropic, not the radial orbits expected if the GCs have condensed out of the infalling gas. As Figures 13–15 demonstrate, purely radial orbits are ruled out at very high signi?cance by our observations. Thus, it appears highly unlikely that a large fraction of M87’s GCs could have formed by mass drop-out from a cooling ?ow. 5.5. Monolithic Collapse Models Can the relatively rapid rotation of the M87 GCS be accommodated within the context of formation models which argue for the monolithic collapse of a single protogalactic gas cloud? Like those of most other giant elliptical galaxies, the M87 GCS is disjoint in terms of its chemical properties (i.e., the GC metallicity distribution function is decidedly bimodal; Whitmore et al. 1995; Geisler et al. 2001; see also Figure 1), and this observation alone provides a compelling argument against the monolithic collapse picture. Figures 7–9 may provide additional evidence against this model: both the metal-poor and metal-rich GC subsamples exhibit signi?cant rotation, with ?R ? 170 km s?1 and (?R)/σp = 0.45. In monolithic collapse scenarios, the angular momentum of galaxies can only arise from tidal torques from companions (Peebles 1969). A common measure of a galaxy’s angular momentum content is the dimensionless spin parameter, Λ = J |E |1/2 G?1 M ?1/2 , where J , E and M are the angular momentum, binding energy and mass of the collapsed galaxy. Fall (1979) showed that, for an elliptical galaxy in gravitational equilibrium, Λ ? 0.3 (?R)/σp . Thus, the inferred spin parameter of the M87 GCS is Λ ? 0.15 — lower than, but still consistent with, the value of Λ ? 0.18 found by Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt (1998) from a smaller sample of GCs. This spin parameter is roughly twice that expected from analytical and numerical simulations of the collapse of a single, isolated protogalactic cloud (Peebles 1969; Efstathiou & Jones 1979). It is, however, worth bearing in mind that M87 is by no means an isolated system. Perhaps a more severe obstacle for such models is the abrupt shift in the orientation of the rotation axis for the metal-poor GC subsample at R ? 16-18 kpc. If real, this feature would be di?cult to explain in models where M87 and its GCS formed via the collapse and spin-up of a single protogalactic cloud. 5.6. Merger and Accretion Models Two variations on the general theme of mergers and accretions have been proposed for the formation of globular cluster systems: (1) major mergers involving a pair of gas-rich disk galaxies (each containing only metal-poor GCs) which results in the formation of new, metal-rich GCs (Ashman & Zepf 1992); and (2) hierarchical growth of a pre-existing “seed” galaxy (containing its own metal-rich GCS) through the accretion of numerous smaller galaxies or protogalactic fragments which harbor predominantly metal-poor GCs (C? ot? e, Marzke & West 1998). We discuss the viability of these two models in light of the dynamical evidence presented above. We begin by reiterating the well established result that mergers of purely stellar disks are a highly unlikely mechanism for the production of giant elliptical galaxies. Both N-body simulations (e.g., Barnes 1992; Hernquist 1992) and simple arguments regarding central phase-space densities (Carlberg 1986) have demonstrated that the end-products of such mergers have cores which are far more di?use than the centers of giant elliptical galaxies. In addition, luminous elliptical galaxies typically have Hubble Types of E2 (Franx, Illingworth & de Zeeuw 1991), whereas the end-products of pairs of stellar disks are frequently more elongated, with Hubble Types of E3-E7 (Hernquist 1992).23 Finally, the merger endproducts often show large misalignments between their rotation and minor axes (Barnes 1992; Weil & Hernquist 1994; Heyl, Hernquist & Spergel 1996; Weil & Hernquist 1996). From an observational perspective, such large misalignments are rare: Franx, Illingworth & de Zeeuw (1991) ?nd much smaller misalignments for the majority of giant elliptical galaxies based on long-slit spectroscopy of their integrated light. There are various ways to surmount some or all of these di?culties within the context of the merger hypothesis: (1) the stellar disks may initially harbor compact bulges with high phase-space densities (Hernquist 1993); (2) the disks may contain signi?cant amounts of gas (Barnes & Hernquist 1996); or (3) ellipticals may be the result of multiple, dissipationless mergers (Weil & Hernquist 1994; 1996). From a purely philosophical perspective, the ?rst option is obviously unsatisfactory given that the initial conditions for spiral-spiral mergers require a signi?cant fraction of the initial mass to reside in compact, dynamically hot components. In the words of Hernquist (1993), “It seems likely that
23 And M87 itself has a Hubble Type of E2 (Van der Marel 1991), though the ellipticity does increase outward, reaching a maximum of E4 in the cD envelope (see Figure 18).

? E ? ET AL. COT

23

even the most strident critics of the merger hypothesis would admit the possibility that mergers of small ellipticals will yield big ellipticals.” The second alternative — that giant ellipticals form during dissipative mergers of pairs of stellar disks, each of which contain signi?cant gas components — is closely related to the Ashman & Zepf (1992) model for the formation of GCSs in giant elliptical galaxies. In the speci?c case of M87, the most compelling piece of evidence for a past major merger is the possible ?ip in the position angle of the rotation axis for the metal-poor GCS; we caution, however, that this interpretation of the observed discontinuity is not unique (see §5.7). As a further complication, the uncertainties involved in correctly modeling the e?ects of gas cooling, feedback and star formation in dissipational spiral-spiral simulations are formidable. To date, the most detailed study of merging galaxies to include gas-dynamical e?ects is that of Barnes & Hernquist (1996), who approximated the interstellar medium as an incompressible ?uid. They found that the inclusion of a gaseous component has a dramatic e?ect on the properties of the merger end-products, and may alleviate some of the problems described above for the case of purely stellar mergers: i.e., including gas leads to merger remnants which have somewhat higher central densities, and may also produce closer alignments between the angular momenta and minor axes. These conclusions, however, are highly dependent on how the gas is assumed to cool (see, e.g., Mihos & Hernquist 1994, and especially §4.3 of Barnes & Hernquist 1996). Simulations of merging stellar disks have shown that the angular momentum axes of the merger remnants often show large misalignments with the minor axes. At large radii, metal-poor and metal-rich GCSs in M87 both rotate around axes which are closely aligned with the minor axis. If the GCs are accurately tracing the kinematics of the underlying galaxy mass, this alignment may constitute a di?culty for the major merger model; that is to say, such a small misalignment in the merger remnant is by no means implausible in the major merger model, but neither is it predicted. In their simulations of gas-free mergers of equal-mass disks, Heyl, Hernquist & Spergel (1996) ?nd the distribution of misalignment angles to be nearly ?at, with occasional misalignments of 75? or 80? although, as mentioned above, gas may play a role in ameliorating these large misalignments. It is clear that additional research into the in?uence of gas on the non-axisymmetry of merger remnants is needed urgently. Moreover, it is important to quantify the expected angular momentum content and rotational properties of any stars or GCs which might form during dissipational mergers. In the case of M87, both the metal-poor and metalrich samples show signi?cant rotation, with (?R)/σp ? 0.45. This value is intermediate to the disparate values of (?R)/σp ? 1 (C? ot? e 1999) and (?R)/σp ? 0.1 (Zepf et al. 2000) observed for the metal-rich GCs belonging to the Milky Way and NGC 4472, respectively. Yet the metal-rich GCs in both of these galaxies have been identi?ed as the end-products of gas-rich mergers (i.e., Ashman & Zepf 1992 and Zepf & Ashman 1993 for the Milky Way; and Zepf et al. 2000 for NGC 4472). In the dissipationless hierarchical growth scenario, the simulations of Weil & Hernquist (1994; 1996) indicate that the rotation axis of the merger remnant is expected to be more closely aligned with the photometric minor axis.24 Strictly speaking, these simulations — which do not include gas — apply to merger remnants of small virialized groups of galaxies, although the generic kinematic properties of the end-products are similar to those found in cosmological simulations of galaxy formation through the hierarchical agglomeration of smaller galaxies and protogalactic fragments (Barnes & Efstathiou 1987; Frenk et al. 1988; Quinn & Zurek 1988; Warren et al. 1992; c.f. Dubinski 1998). In general, the assumed initial conditions would be appropriate if centrally dominant galaxies such as M87 are the result of mergers of small subgroups which later coalesced into larger structures, as originally suggested by White (1982). The end-products of these simulations appear nearly round in most projections, and exhibit small kinematic misalignments when integrated over the full range in radius. Near their centers, they show relatively little rotation, but can rotate rapidly in their outer regions, with 0 < ? vrot /σ < ? 0.8, although this conclusion is likely to depend on the assumed orbital properties of the progenitor galaxies (Dubinski 1998). In short, these results are broadly consistent with the observed behavior of the metal-poor GCS in M87, but the poorly-constrained rotation curve at large radii makes de?nite conclusions impossible. There is also some evidence that the inferred rotation of the M87 GCS (particularly that of the metal-poor component) may include a contribution from large-scale streaming motions along the Virgo principal axis (see below). And while the simulations of Weil & Hernquist (1996) produce end-products with low triaxialities and roughly oblate shapes (consistent with the results of dynamical modeling of the line-of-sight velocity pro?le in the inner regions of M87; e.g., van der Marel 1991; 1994; Bender et al. 1994), it is important to bear in mind that the N-body simulations, though similar in some respects to the hierarchical growth model of C? ot? e et al. (1998), are not completely analogous. Most notably, the N-body simulations do not include a single dominant progenitor galaxy, whereas in the agglomeration picture of C? ot? e et al. (1998), the metal-rich clusters arise in the dissipative (monolithic) collapse of this component. A more de?nitive test of these scenarios will require a crucial piece of evidence which is currently lacking: accurate age estimates for the metal-rich and metal-poor GCs. To date, the limited observational evidence have proven inconclusive. Kundu et al. (1998) argued, on the basis of broadband V I photometry, that the metal-rich GCs in M87 are 3-6 Gyr younger than their metal-poor counterparts, as expected in the major merger model model. However, this claimed age di?erence is roughly the same size as the uncertainties involved in using broadband V I colors to derive GC ages, and is in contradiction with the ?ndings of Cohen et al. (1998) who, from Keck spectroscopy of the brightest clusters in M87, found the metal-rich and metal-poor GC populations to be both old and coeval (i.e., T ? 13 Gyr).
24 Direct evidence that this process has played a role in the formation and evolution of M87 has been presented by Weil, Bland-Hawthorn & Malin (1997) who identi?ed a di?use plume of stellar material at large radii — the likely result of the accretion of a small satellite galaxy.

24

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

The principal obstacle to understanding the merger/accretion history of M87 remains the uncertain role played by gas. From a theoretical point of view, improved numerical simulations that include gas-dynamical e?ects and star formation are needed urgently. On the observational front, it is important to measure the star formation history of the GCS directly, through improved age estimates for the chemically distinct GC populations (e.g., Jordan et al. 2002). 5.7. Connection to the Virgo Cluster on Larger Scales It has long been known that the brightest of Virgo’s giant elliptical galaxies de?ne a remarkably linear pattern on the plane of the sky (Arp 1968). It was recently shown that this extended arrangement, which passes through the cluster core at a position angle of 110-125? and is roughly centered on M87, is the projection of a highly collinear, three-dimensional ?lament — the so-called “principal axis” of the Virgo cluster (West & Blakeslee 2000). Thus, the rotation axis of the M87 globular cluster system not only coincides with the galaxy’s minor axis at large galactocentric radii, but is also roughly aligned with the minor axis of the surrounding cluster. It is then natural to ask if some fraction of the GCS around M87 may somehow be associated with Virgo itself (White 1987; West et al. 1995). One mechanism that might give rise to such a population of “intracluster” GCs is their acquisition from other galaxies by tidal stripping (White 1987; West et al. 1995). Another is the possible formation of GCs in “failed dwarfs” throughout Virgo: low-mass, loosely bound clouds of gas — analogous to, but rather more isolated than, the protogalactic fragments thought to form stars and globular clusters in most large galaxies (see, e.g., Harris & Pudritz 1994; C? ot? e et al. 1998, 2000) — that formed normal complements of (generally metal-poor) globular clusters, but were then destroyed before much further star formation occurred, perhaps as a result of galactic winds driven at least in part by the GC formation itself (Harris et al. 1998; McLaughlin 2000). Whether or not the numbers of any such clouds were enhanced in Virgo through cold-dark-matter biasing of either the GCs (West 1993) or their host protogalactic fragments (see Ferguson & Binggeli 1994), the plausible result could have been an addition to the intracluster medium of globular clusters and hot gas that eventually settled naturally to the bottom of the cluster’s potential well, i.e., directly around M87. The evidence in support of such a connection between the M87 GCS and the Virgo cluster can be summarized as follows. First, like all cD galaxies, M87 possesses an extended, low-surface-brightness envelope, and much evidence exists that such envelopes are entities quite distinct from cD galaxy cores. For instance, these galaxies obey the Dn -σ relation de?ned by normal ellipticals only after the luminosity excess above an R1/4 -law ?t to the surface brightness pro?le of the interior is excluded (Tonry 1987); the total luminosity of cD envelopes correlates with several cluster properties including cluster richness and X-ray luminosity; the surface brightness pro?les of the envelopes obey density pro?les that roughly match that of the galaxies in their parent clusters (Schombert 1988); and the ellipticity and position angle of the galaxy isophotes often show dramatic discontinuities at the radius where the envelope begins to dominate the surface brightness pro?le. This latter issue is particularly germane in the case of M87. McLaughlin, Harris & Hanes (1993, 1994) showed that

Fig. 18.— Orientation of the angular momenta axes of metal-poor and metal-rich globular clusters surrounding M87 (blue and red arrows, respectively) overlaid on an image from the Palomar Digital Sky Survey. A ?xed radial bin width of ?R = 90′′ ? 6.5 kpc has been adopted throughout. The length of each arrow is proportional to the amplitude of the best-?t sine curve in each annulus. The maximum positive rotation velocity at each radius is found 90? counter-clockwise of the direction indicated by the arrows. The image measures 20′ × 20′ on a side, or 87.3×87.3 kpc for our adopted M87 distance. The luminosity-weighted mean photometric minor and major axes for the galaxy are indicated by the solid yellow lines. The dotted yellow curves indicate the best-?t ellipses to the surface brightness pro?le from Carter and Dixon (1978). The dashed ellipse indicates the approximate location and orientation of the galaxy’s cD envelope.

? E ? ET AL. COT

25

Fig. 19.— Panel a: The line-of-sight, rotational velocity ?eld for the M87 globular cluster system obtained using the full sample of 278 clusters with measured radial velocities (dots). North is up and east is to the left. Contours are labeled in km s?1 with respect to the mean velocity. Solid contours indicate positive velocities, while dashed contours indicate negative velocities. Panel b: Same as (a) except for the sample of 117 metal-rich (red) globular clusters. Panel c: Same as (a) except for the sample of 161 metal-poor (blue) globular clusters. Panel d: Plane-of-best-?t to the rotational velocity ?eld of metal-poor globular clusters. Contours are labelled in km s?1 with respect to the mean velocity. As in (a), solid contours indicate positive velocities, while dashed contours indicate negative velocities. Panel e: The line-of-sight, rotational velocity ?eld for 117 Virgo galaxies located within 2? of M87 (dots). North is up and east is to the left. Contours are labelled in km s?1 with respect to the mean velocity. As in (a), solid contours indicate positive velocities, while dashed contours indicate negative velocities. Panel f: Plane-of-best-?t to the rotational velocity ?eld of Virgo galaxies located within 2? of M87. Contours are labelled in km s?1 with respect to the mean velocity. As in (a), solid contours indicate positive velocities, while dashed contours indicate negative velocities.

the GCS itself exhibits a sharp jump in surface density which coincides with the onset of the stellar cD envelope, and that the ellipticity and orientation of the GCS roughly matches that of the underlying envelope. Moreover, as was described in §4, the so-called “excess” of globular clusters at large radii in M87 is now recognized to be not a genuine surfeit, but a consequence of the fact that the GCS-to-baryon mass ratio there has the same value, ρcl (r)/[ρgas (r) + ρstars (r)] = 0.0026, that is exhibited by nearly one hundred other galaxies (McLaughlin 1999b). Since the stellar component of M87 dies out relatively rapidly beyond r > ? 50 kpc (e.g., Fig. 11), the natural interpretation is that the distant GCs are associated with the X-ray gas around M87 — and that gas is itself at the virial temperature of the Virgo cluster dark matter halo (see, e.g., McLaughlin 1999a). The dynamical analysis presented in this paper adds to this line of argument. In particular, it is noteworthy that the position angle of the rotation axis of the metal-poor GCs shows an apparent discontinuity close to the onset of the cD envelope. To aid in the visualization of this discontinuity, Figure 18 shows the orientation of the angular momenta axes of metal-poor and metal-rich GCs surrounding M87 overlaid on an image from the Palomar Digital Sky Survey. The blue and red arrows refer to the metal-poor and metal-rich GCs, respectively. The length of each arrow is proportional to the

26

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

Fig. 20.— Aperture dispersion pro?les of the metal-poor (blue) and metal-rich (red) globular clusters around M87, and of the early-type galaxies in the Virgo Cluster at large radii (data from Girardi et al. 1996, shown with 95% con?dence limits as error bars). Curves are the full extent of the models for the blue globular cluster system with a ?xed orbital anisotropy of β ≡ ?0.4 (cf. Figures 14), for the red globular cluster system with β ≡ +0.4 (cf. Figure 15), and for the two subsamples combined with a ?xed β ≡ 0 (cf. Figure 13).

amplitude (?R) of the best-?t sine curve in radial bins of ?xed width ?R = 90′′ ? 6.5 kpc (see Fig. 8). The dotted yellow curves show the best-?t ellipses to the surface brightness pro?le of the galaxy, taken from Carter and Dixon (1978). The ellipse nearest the onset of the cD envelope is shown by the bold, dashed curve. Recall from §4 that in the limit of r → ∞, nblue /nred → 4. Thus, the metal-poor component dominates the GCS at these radii, although both components (i.e., the metal-rich and the metal-poor cluster systems) appear to rotate around an axis which is roughly aligned with the minor axis of the large-scale structure in Virgo. At the largest observed radii, the rotation curve of the GCS approaches the circular velocity of Virgo itself (although the uncertainties in the ?tted values of ?R are large at these distances). To examine the apparent rotation of the M87 GCS in more detail, and to explore the possible connections with bulk motions in the Virgo cluster, we have generated two-dimensional maps of the GC velocity ?elds using the non-parametric techniques described in Gebhardt et al. (1995) and Merritt, Meylan & Mayor (1997). In this approach, the cluster-bycluster velocity residuals about a mean, line-of-sight velocity are smoothed with a “thin-plate smoothing spline” which is chosen on the basis of a generalized cross validation technique (Wahba 1990). The results of this exercise are presented in Figure 19. Panels (a-c) in this ?gure show smoothed velocity ?elds for the full sample of GCs, the metal-rich subsample and the metal-poor subsample, respectively. A striking feature of this ?gure (panel b) is the form of the rotational ?eld for the metal-rich GCs: i.e., it appears non-cylindrical in nature, consistent with the discussion around equations (3)-(5) in §3. Rather, the rotation ?eld shows a “double-lobed” pattern with maxima at R ? 3.5-4Re (25-30 kpc) along the approximate photometric major axis of the galaxy, although additional radial velocities may be needed to fully characterize the true two-dimensional rotation ?eld. Panel (c) suggests that the rotation ?eld of the metal-poor GCS may more closely resemble that of a solid body; or, alternatively, it may show evidence for a “shear” in the line-of-sight velocity. The magnitude and orientation of this putative shear is apparent in panel (d) of this Figure, which shows the plane of best-?t to the velocity residuals for the metal-poor GCS. Interestingly, the sharp ?ip in the rotation axis of the metal-poor clusters seen in the previous Figure is not obvious in this (smoothed) representation of the two-dimensional velocity ?eld, although there does appear to be a local minimum in the rotation velocity due south of the galaxy’s center at a distance of R ? 1.5Re (7 kpc). Based on the kinematics of dwarf galaxies and X-ray imaging, Binggeli (1999) has argued that the Virgo cluster, and particularly its dwarf galaxies, are not yet in dynamical equilibrium. Rather, material appears to be infalling onto M87 along the principal axis of the Virgo cluster. It is notable that this axis passes though both M87 and M86 — each of these supergiant elliptical galaxies is embedded in a swarm of dwarf elliptical galaxies and thereby de?nes a major Virgo subcluster. It is therefore natural to ask if the kinematics of the GCS surrounding M87 is related to that of the more distant Virgo galaxies. Such a comparison is especially relevant to the notion that some fraction of the M87 GCS might be composed of the accreted and/or infalling remains of “failed dwarfs”. In order to compare the large-scale kinematics of Virgo directly to that of the M87 GCS, we have carried out the

? E ? ET AL. COT

27

same smoothing procedure described above for the Virgo cluster galaxies. Using the NASA Extragalactic Database, we identi?ed a sample of 117 galaxies which are located within 2? (525 kpc) of M87 and have measured radial velocities in the range ?1000 ≤ cz ≤ 3500 km s?1 . The two-dimensional rotation ?eld for this sample is shown in panel (e) of Figure 19; the corresponding plane of best-?t to the observed velocity residuals is shown in panel (f). Although the limited sample size makes ?rm conclusions impossible, it does appear that the Virgo galaxies show evidence for a gradient in their line-of-sight velocity which is roughly in the same direction as that observed for the distant metal-poor GCs surrounding M87 — broadly consistent with the infall picture.25 Finally, we consider the one-dimensional velocity dispersion pro?le of the M87 GCS in the larger context of the surrounding Virgo cluster. Figure 20 shows the measured and predicted GC aperture dispersion pro?les from Figures 1315, placed now on an expanded radial scale that also includes data for 246 early-type (mostly dE) Virgo galaxies from Girardi et al. (1996). Error bars on the latter measurements refer to 95% con?dence limits. The three curves show the predicted σap pro?les corresponding to the GC subsystems and orbital anisotropies indicated in the lower right corner of the ?gure. Cases of purely radial orbits, β = 1, are not shown since all such models are ruled out at high con?dence (see Figures 13–15).26 Given that the early-type galaxies in Virgo trace the cluster’s dark-matter density pro?le (McLaughlin 1999a), the striking match seen here between the kinematics of the GCs and the galaxies lends support to our earlier assertion (recall eqs. [12]–[14] and Fig. 12) that, in the limit of large galactocentric radius, the M87 GCS also traces the Virgo dark matter. Thus, the properties of the globular clusters surrounding M87 are consistent with their being an ensemble of test particles — identical in this regard to the Virgo galaxies — which happen to be orbiting in the potential well de?ned by both the galaxy and its parent cluster.
6. SUMMARY

We have presented a dynamical analysis of the GC system surrounding M87, the cD galaxy at the dynamical center of the Virgo cluster. Our database consists of new wide-?eld imaging in the Washington C and T1 ?lters, and radial velocities for 278 GCs taken from the literature or obtained during a dedicated spectroscopic survey conducted with the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope. This constitutes the largest sample of radial velocities for pure Population II tracers yet assembled for any galaxy. A complete description of the database is presented in a companion paper (Hanes et al. 2001). Surface density pro?les measured from our CT1 images reveals the metal-poor GCS to be more spatially extended than the metal-rich population, consistent with earlier ?ndings based on HST imaging in the central regions of the galaxy. Beyond a radius of R ? 1.5Re (10 kpc), the metal-poor clusters dominate the total GCS. The combined, metal-poor and metal-rich samples all show signi?cant rotation of mean amplitude ?R ? 170 km s?1 about axes whose position angles are indistinguishable from that of the photometric minor axis, Θ0 = 65? . The metal-rich GCS shows a roughly ?at rotation ?1 curve of mean amplitude ?R = 160+130 . Apart from a possible drift in position angle of the rotation axis at ?99 km s R ? 2Re , the metal-rich clusters appear to be rotating everywhere about the photometric minor axis of the galaxy. The rotation ?eld, however, appears non-cylindrical — a two-dimensional map of the rotation ?eld for the metal-rich GCs shows a “double-lobed” pattern, with maxima at R ? 3.5-4Re (25-30 kpc) along the approximate photometric major axis of the galaxy. ?1 While the mean rotation velocity of the metal-poor GCS, ?R = 172+51 , is indistinguishable from that of its ?108 km s metal-rich counterpart, a two-dimensional map of the rotation ?eld suggests that this system may rotate as a solid-body or, alternatively, it may exhibit a “shear” in the line-of-sight velocity. This putative shear is similar to that observed for Virgo galaxies within two degrees of M87 — broadly consistent with a scenario in which some, or all, of the distant, metal-poor GCs are gradually infalling onto M87 along Virgo’s principal axis. Inside R ? 2.5Re (18 kpc), the approximate onset of the galaxy’s cD envelope, the metal-poor GCS appears to rotate around the photometric major axis. The surface brightness pro?le of M87 has been combined with ROSAT observations of the surrounding X-ray gas to construct a mass model for the Virgo cluster. A comparison of the observed and predicted GC velocity dispersion pro?les based on this model, and on the measured GC density pro?les, suggests that the velocity ellipsoid of the composite GCS is almost perfectly isotropic. Dividing the sample on the basis of metallicity reveals the metal-poor clusters to be slightly biased to tangential orbits, with βcl ? ?0.4, while the metal-rich cluster system shows a radial bias of the roughly the same magnitude: βcl ? +0.4. We note that a simple mass model for M87 and Virgo provides a remarkably accurate match to the observed GC kinematics, suggesting that the GCs, as a whole, belong to both M87 and the surrounding Virgo cluster. More detailed conclusions concerning the formation of M87 and its GCS must await the measurement of precise ages for the metal-poor and metal-rich GC systems — the most outstanding observational constraints bearing on this issue. PC gratefully acknowledges support provided by the Sherman M. Fairchild Foundation during the course of this work. DEM acknowledges support from NASA through grant number HF-1097.01-97A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA under contract NAS5-26555. DG acknowledges ?nancial support for this project received from CONICYT through Fondecyt grant
25 Note that the observed “shear” is probably not due to the projection of the Virgo space velocity onto the plane of the sky. The expected magnitude of this e?ect is vproj = vs sin?, where vs is the cluster space velocity and ? ? 0.3? is the angle spanned by the GCs with measured velocities. Thus, for an assumed Virgo space velocity of vs = 2000 km s?1 , vproj ? 10 km s?1 , far less than the size of the velocity gradient seen in panel (d) of Figure 19. 26 Indeed, the fact that purely radial orbits are so strongly ruled out for the GCS as a whole suggests that any infall component of GCs on high-eccentricity orbits probably constitutes only a subsample of the overall system.

28

DYNAMICS OF THE M87 GLOBULAR CLUSTER SYSTEM

8000002, and by the Universidad de Concepcion through research grant No. 99.011.025-1.0. The research of DAH and GLHH is supported through grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. DAH is pleased to thank the Directors of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory and the Anglo-Australian Observatory for their hospitality and support during a research sabbatical. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
REFERENCES Arnaboldi, M., Freeman, K.C., Gerhard, O., Matthis, M., Kudritzki, R.P., M? endez, R.H., Capaccioli, M., & Ford, H.C. 1998, ApJ, 507, 759 Arp, H. 1968, PASP, 80, 129 Ashman, K.M., & Zepf, S.E. 1992, ApJ, 384, 50 Beers, T.C., Flynn, K., & Gebhardt, K. 1990, AJ, 100, 32 Bahcall, J.N., & Soneira, R.M. 1981, ApJS, 47, 357 Barnes, J. 1992, ApJ, 393, 484 Barnes, J., & Efstathiou, G. 1987, ApJ, 319, 575 Barnes & Hernquist 1996, ApJ, 471, 115 Bender, R., Saglia, R.P., & Gerhard, O.E. 1994, MNRAS, 269, 785 Binggeli, B., Sandage, A.R., & Tammann, G.A. 1985, AJ, 90, 1681 Binggeli, B., Popescu, C.C., & Tammann, G.A. 1993, A&AS, 98, 275 Binggeli, B. 1999, in The Radio Galaxy Messier 87, Ringberg Workshop, ed.H.-J. Ro¨ ser and K.Meisenheimer (Springer, Berlin), 9 Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics, (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press), 640 Carlberg, R.G. 1986, ApJ, 310, 593 Cohen, J.G., & Ryzhov, A. 1997, ApJ, 486, 230 Cohen, J.G., Blakeslee, J.P., & Ryzhov, A. 1998, ApJ, 496, 808 Cohen, J.G. 2000, AJ, 119, 162 C? ot? e, P. 1999, AJ, 118, 406 C? ot? e, P., Marzke, R.O., & West, M.J. 1998, ApJ, 501, 554 C? ot? e, P., Marzke, R.O., West, M.J., & Minniti, D. 2000, ApJ, 533, 869 Carter, D., & Dixon, K.L. 1978, AJ, 83, 6 Davies, R.L., & Birkinshaw, M. 1988, ApJS, 68, 409 de Vaucouleurs, G., & Nieto, J.-L. 1978, ApJ, 220, 449 Dubinski, J. 1998, ApJ, 502, 141 Efstathiou, G., & Jones, B.J.T. 1979, MNRAS, 186, 133 Fabian, A.C., Nulsen, P.E.J., & Canizares, C.R. Nature, 310, 733 Fall, S.M. 1979, RvMP, 51, 21 Ferguson, & Binggeli 1994, A&ARv, 6, 67 Ferrarese, L., et al. 1996, ApJ, 464, 568 Fillmore, J. A. 1986, AJ, 91, 1096 Franx, M., Illingworth, G., & de Zeeuw, T. 1991, ApJ, 383, 112 Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., Davis, M., & Efstathiou, G. 1988, ApJ, 327, 507 Gebhardt, K., Pryor, C., Williams, T.B., & Hesser, J.E. 1995, AJ, 110, 1699. Geisler, D. & Forte, J.C. 1990, AJ, 350, 5 Geisler, D., Lee, M.G., & Kim, E. 1996, AJ, 111, 1529 Geisler, D., Lee, M.G., & Kim, E. 2001, in preparation Girardi, M., Fadda, D., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, M., Mezzetti, M., & Biviano, A. 1996, ApJ, 457, 61 Hanes, D.A., Bridges, T.J., C? ot? e, P., Geisler, D., McLaughlin, D.E., Hesser, J.E., Harris, G.L.H., & Lee., M.G. 2001, in preparation (Paper I) Harris, W.E., & Pudritz, R.E. 1994, ApJ, 429, 177 Harris, W.E., Harris, G.L.H., & McLaughlin, D.E. 1998, AJ, 115, 1801 Hernquist, L. 1992, ApJ, 400, 460 Hernquist, L. 1993, ApJ, 409, 548 Heyl, J.S., Hernquist, L., & Spergel, D.N. 1996, ApJ, 463, 69 Huchra, J., & Brodie, J. 1987, AJ93, 779 Hui, X., Ford, H.C., Freeman, K.C., & Dopita, M.A. 1995, ApJ, 449, 592 Jordan, A., C? ot? e, P., West, M.J., & Marzke, R.O. 2002, in preparation. Kissler-Patig, M., & Gebhardt, K. 1998, AJ, 116, 2237 Kundu, A., Whitmore, B.C., Sparks, W.B., Macchetto, F.D., Zepf, S.E., & Ashman, K.M. 1999, ApJ, 513, 733 Lee, M.G., Kim, E., & Geisler, D. 1998, AJ, 115, 957 McLaughlin, D.E. 1995, AJ, 109, 2034 McLaughlin, D.E. 1999a, ApJ, 512, L9 McLaughlin, D.E. 1999b, AJ, 117, 2398 McLaughlin, D.E. 2000, in ESA SP-445, Star Formation from the Small to the Large Scale, ed. F. Favata, A. Kaas, and A. Wilson (Noordwijk: ESA), p. 77 McLaughlin, D.E., Harris, W.E., & Hanes, D.A. 1993, ApJ, 409, L45 McLaughlin, D.E., Harris, W.E., & Hanes, D.A. 1994, ApJ, 422, 486 Merritt, D., & Tremblay, B. 1993, AJ, 106, 2229 Merritt, D., & Oh, S.-P. 1997, AJ, 113, 1279 Merritt, D., Meylan, G., & Mayor, M. 1997, AJ, 114, 1074 Mihos, J.C., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ, asp437, 47 Mould, J.R., Oke, J.B., & Nemec, J. 1987, AJ, 93, 53 Mould, J.R., Oke, J.B., de Zeeuw, P.T., & Nemec, J. 1990, AJ, 99, 1823 Murali, C., & Weinberg, M.D. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 717 Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., & White, S.D.M. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 Neilsen, E.H., Tsvetanov, Z.I., & Ford, H.C. 1999, in The Radio Galaxy Messier 87, Ringberg Workshop, ed.H.-J. Ro¨ ser and K.Meisenheimer (Springer, Berlin), 50 ¨ Nulsen, P.E.J., & Bhringer, H. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1093 Ostriker, J. P., Binney, J., & Saha, P. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 849 Peebles, P.J.E. 1969, ApJ, 155, 393 Pesce, E., Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R., & Vietri, M. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 466 Pierce, M.J., Welch, D.L., McClure, R,D, van den Bergh, S., Racine, R., & Stetson, P.B. 1994, Nature, 371, 385 Quinn, P.J., & Zurek, W.H. 1988, ApJ, 331, 1 Ratnatunga, K.U., & Bahcall, J.N. 1985, ApJS, 59, 63 Romanowsky, A. J., & Kochanek, C. S. 2000, preprint (astroph/0008062) Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 Schombert, J.M. 1988, ApJ, 328, 475 Schweizer, F. 1980, ApJ, 237, 303 Secker, J., Geisler, D., McLaughlin, D.E., & Harris, W.E. 1995, AJ, 109, 1019 Strom, S.E., Strom, K.M., Wells, D.C., Forte, J.C., Smith, M.G., & Harris, W.E. 1981, ApJ, 245, 416 Sharples, R.M., Zepf, S.E., Bridges, T.J., Hanes, D.A., Carter, D., Ashman, K.M., & Geisler, D. 1998, AJ, 115, 2337 Tonry, J.L. 1987, in The Structure and Dynamics of Elliptical Galaxies, IAU Symposium No. 117, ed. T. de Zeeuw, (Dordrecht, Reidel), 89 van der Marel, R.P. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 710 van der Marel, R.P. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 271 Wahba, G. 1990, Spline Models for Observational Data (SIAM, Philadelphia) Warren, M.S., Quinn, P.J., Salmon, J.K., & Zurek, W.H. 1992, ApJ, 399, 405 Weil, M.L., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ, 431, L79 Weil, M.L., & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 460, 101 Weil, M.L., Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Malin, D.F. 1997, ApJ, 490, 664 West, M.J. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 755 West, M.J., C? ot? e, P., Jones, C., Forman, W., & Marzke, R.O. 1995, ApJ, 453, L77 West, M.J., & Blakeslee, J.P. 2000, ApJ, 543, L27 White, R.E. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 185 White, S.D.M. 1982, in Morphology and Dynamics of Galaxies, Twelfth Advanced Course of the Swiss Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. L. Martinet & M. Mayor (Geneva: Geneva Observatory), 291 Zepf, S.E., & Ashman, K.M. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 611 Zepf, S.E., Beasley, M.A., Bridges, T.J., Hanes, D.A., Sharples, R.M., Ashman, K.M., & Geisler, D. 2000, AJ, 120, 2928

This figure "m87paper2-fig18.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/astro-ph/0106005v1



更多相关文章:
更多相关标签:

All rights reserved Powered by 甜梦文库 9512.net

copyright ©right 2010-2021。
甜梦文库内容来自网络,如有侵犯请联系客服。zhit325@126.com|网站地图