9512.net

甜梦文库

甜梦文库

当前位置：首页 >> >> # Low-energy formulas for neutrino masses with $tan beta$-dependent hierarchy

arXiv:hep-ph/9710328v3 9 Nov 1997

LOW–ENERGY FORMULAS FOR NEUTRINO MASSES WITH tan β-DEPENDENT HIERARCHY

M.K.Parida

High Energy Physics Group, International Centre for Theoretical Physics, I–34100 Trieste, Italy

and Physics Department, North–Eastern Hill University, P.O.Box 21,Laitumkhrah

Shillong 793 003,India

N.Nimai Singh

Physics Department, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781 014, India (October 13,1997)

Abstract

Using radiative corrections and seesaw mechanism, we derive analytic formulas for neutrino masses at low energies in SUSY uni?ed theories exhibiting a new hierarchial relation,for the ?rst time, among them. The new hierarchy is found to be quite signi?cant especially for smaller values of tan β. 12.10.Dm, 12.60.Jv

Typeset using REVTEX 1

Uni?cation of gauge and Yukawa couplings in supersymmetric grand uni?ed theories and

their predictions have received considerable attention over the last decades [1-4]. In addition

to solving the well-known gauge hierarchy problem, SUSY uni?ed theories based upon N = 1

supergravity, or originating from superstrings, provide an elegant method of uni?cation with

gravity. Independent of these, the problem of neutrino masses has intrigued experimental

as well as theoretical physicists since more than sixty years. If a uni?ed theory, based upon

supergravity or superstrings, is to be accepted as the ultimate fundamental theory of nature,

fermion masses including those of neutrinos have to emerge as necessary predictions of such

a theory. The simplest and the most elegant method of obtaining neutrino masses is through

seesaw mechanism [5] leading to the Majorana masses of left–handed neutrinos:

mνi

=

Cνi

m2i MN

,

i = 1, 2, 3

(1)

where νi (i = 1, 2, 3) = (νe, ν?, ντ ) and mi(i = 1, 2, 3) = (mu, mc, mtop). With Cνi ? 1, the canonical seesaw formula is valid at the scale (? = MX) where, due to spontaneous symmetry breaking, a higher gauge symmetry such as SUSY SO(10), or one of its intermediate gauge

groups, breaks down to the SUSY standard model and the right–handed Majorana neutrinos

acquire mass MN ( assumed degenerate). But the limits on neutrino masses extending over wide range of values, are estimated either from cosmology or experimental measurements

like tritium β-decay, neutrinoless double β-decay, solar and atmospheric neutrino ?uxes and

neutrino oscillations at LSND [6]. Therefore, it is of utmost importance and considerable

interest that accurate predictions of the seesaw mechanism are made available at low en-

ergies. For the ?rst time, Bludmann, Kennedy and Langacker (BKL) [7] found that Cνi’s deviate drastically from unity due to radiative corrections. Very signi?cant re?nements using

semi-analytic and numerical methods, including renormalisation of Yukawa couplings and

neutrino-mass operator, have been carried out in SUSY [8] and nonSUSY SO(10) [8-9]. In

this work, we derive low-energy formulas for neutrino masses, analytically, in SUSY uni?ed

theories demonstrating,for the ?rst time, the existence of a new hierarchial relation among

them. We also estimate the impact of such a new hierarchy on neutrino-mass ratio predic-

2

tions for interesting regions of tan β corresponding to t ? b ? τ and b ? τ Yukawa uni?cation

models.In the small tan β region the mass ratios are found to be very signi?cantly dependent

upon tan β.

The derivation of analytic formulas is carried out using the renornalisation group equa-

tions (RGEs) at one–loop level for gauge couplings (gi(t) , i = 1, 2, 3), Yukawa couplings (hi(t)) [8,10–12], neutrino mass operator (K(t)) [8] and vacuum expectation value (VEV) of u-type Higgs doublet (Vu(t)) [11] in SUSY standard model embedded in GUTs like SO(10) without [3,10–12] or with an intermediate gauge symmetry [4],

dhf (t) dt

=

Ohf (t)

,

f

=

u, c, top, b, τ

(2)

Ohtop

=

htop 16π2

3

6h2top + h2b ? Cigi2

i=1

(3)

Ohb

=

hb 16π2

3

6h2b + h2τ + h2top ? Ci′gi2

i=1

(4)

Ohτ

=

hτ 16π2

3

4h2τ + 3h2b ? Ci′′gi2

i=1

(5)

Ohu,c

=

hu,c 16π2

3

3h2top ? Cigi2

i=1

(6)

13

16

Ci = ( 15 , 3 , 3 )

Ci′ = (

7 15

,

3,

16 3

)

Ci′′

=

(

9 5

,

3

,

0

)

dgi dt

=

bigi3 16π2

,

i

=

1, 2, 3

bi

=(

33 5

,

1,

?3

)

(7)

3

dK K dt = 16π2

6h2top

+

2h2τ

?

6 5

g12

?

6g22

(8)

In eqs.(2)–(8), i = 1, 2, 3 correspond to the gauge groups U(1)Y , SU(2)L, and SU(3)C of the SUSY standard model assumed to hold for ? ≥ mtop = MSUSY . The variable t = ln ? is the natural logarithm of the scale parameter ?. We include scale (t = ln ?) dependence in the Yukawa couplings [8,10-12] as well as the vacuum expectation value [11] in the de?nition of the quark masses,

mu,c,top(t)

=

hu,c,top√(t)Vu(t) 2

(9)

Using eq.(9) and evolving K from the higher mass scale ? = MX to ? = ?0 = mtop, the renormalized coe?cients in the seesaw formula are,

mνi (t0 )

=

Cνi

(t0)

m2i (t0 MN

)

,

i

=

1, 2, 3

(10)

Cνi(t0) =

htop,c,u(tx) 2 htop,c,u(t0)

K (t0 ) K (tx )

(11)

where t0 = ln mtop and tx = ln MX . It is to be noted that, the running VEV[11] cancels out from in eq.(11) yielding the same renormalization as noted in ref.[8]. Now using RGEs

(2)–(8), we obtain in a straight forward manner,

Cντ (t0) = R(t0) e(6Itop+2Ib?2Iτ )

(12)

Cν?,e (t0) = R(t0) e?2Iτ

3

R(t0) =

i=1

αi(tx) αi(t0)

di

bi

,

di =

?4 15

,

0,

?16 3

If

=

1 16π2

(tx ) (t0 )

h2f

(t)

dt

,

f

= top, b, τ.

4

(13)

(14) (15)

In evolving the masses and gauge couplings to scales below ?0 = mtop, we ignore negligible contribution to Cνi between the scales MZ and mtop. Below ? = MZ (tz = ln MZ), the renormalisation of the quark masses, mc and mu, occur due to the presence of the gauge symmetry SU(3)C × U(1)em leading to well-known QCD–QED rescaling factors [11],

ηu

?

mu(0) mu(t0)

,

ηc

?

mc(tc) mc(t0)

.

(16)

We then obtain

mν? (tc )

?

Cν?

(tc

)

m2c (tc) MN

(17)

mνe (0)

?

Cνe (0)

m2u(0) MN

(18)

where

Cν? (tc )

=

R(t0) ηc2

e?2Iτ

(19)

Cνe (0)

=

R(t0) ηu2

e?2Iτ

(20)

In eqs.(16)–(20), tc = ln mc and t1 = ln ?1 = 0 for ?1 = 1GeV. The quantities in the R.H.S. of (12) have negligible contributions due to renormalisation e?ects carried down to

lower energies, ? = ?1 = 1GeV (t = t1 = 0) although those in (13) change signi?cantly. Combining eqs.(10)–(20), we obtain the low energy formulas for the left–handed Majorana

neutrinos of three generations,

mντ

=

R e(6Itop+2Ib?2Iτ ) m2top MN

(21)

mν?

=

R ηc2

e?2Iτ

m2c MN

(22)

mνe

=

R ηu2

e?2Iτ

m2u MN

(23)

5

where R = R(t0) as de?ned in (14) and the masses occuring on the R.H.S. are the low–energy values. The formulas (21)–(23) predict low energy values of neutrino masses, analytically ,in a large class of SUSY uni?ed theories including SO(10) which can be compared with the experimental values.If the right-handed neutrino masses are nondegenerate,these formulas can be easily generalised by replacing MN by MNi for the ith generation in eqs.(21)-(23).But independent of any assumed value of the degenerate right-handed neutrino mass ,the formulas predict a new hierarchial relation,

mντ : mν? : mνe :: m2top exp(6Itop + 2Ib)

: (m2c/ηc2) : (m2u/ηu2)

(24)

Using the experimentally observed values of the quark masses mu, mc and mtop = 174GeV,

the CERN–LEP measurements, and ηu and ηc [12], we have evaluated the central values

and

uncertainties

of

Cνi

(i

=

e, ?, τ ),

for

di?erent

values

of

tan β

=

, Vu

Vd

the

ratio

of

VEVs

of

the u–type and d–type Higgs doublets. The details of such analyses and their aapplications

to di?erent SO(10) models will be reported elsewhere. It is quite clear that the low-energy

predictions on neutrino masses depend crucially on the nature and values of Yukawa cou-

plings between mtop and MX.For example,if the Yukawa couplings increase at faster rate in certain GUTs,which may occur due to appearance of new degrees of freedom at higher mass

scales ,the new contributions to integrals over squares of Yukawa couplings , are likely to

predict neutrino masses di?erent from conventional SUSY SO(10).However,here we con?ne

to numerical results on the relative hierarchy between mντ and mν? or mνe in conventional

SUSY GUTs, which doe not depend upon the arbitrariness on MN ,

mντ mν?

=

m2top m2c

ηc2

e(6Itop +2Ib )

(25)

mντ mνe

=

m2top m2u

ηu2

e(6Itop +2Ib )

(26)

It may be recognised that the second and third factors in the R.H.S. of (25)–(26) are due to

radiative corrections from MX down to low energies, corresponding to the ratios,

6

Cντ Cν?

= ηc2 e(6Itop+2Ib)

Cντ Cνe

= ηu2 e(6Itop+2Ib)

(27)

For larger values of tan β corresponding to t ? b ? τ Yukawa uni?cation in supergrand

desert models, the Yukawa couplings at the GUT scale and hence the values of Ib ,Iτ , and Itop change slowly with tan β. The value of exp [ 6Itop, ] almost remains constant giving rise to Cντ /Cνe ? 15 ? 20 and mντ /mνe ? (2 ? 3) × 1010 for tan β = 10 ? 59.As compared to the BKL value[7] of mντ /mnue ? 9.2 × 109,the enhancement in the hierarchy in this region is only 2-2.5. But as tan β decreases and approaches the value of 1.7, as in b ? τ uni?cation

models with a super grand desert,htop(MX) and hence Itop increase with the decrease of tan β while hb(MX ) ,hτ , Ib and Iτ are negligible. Thus,we ?nd that,for smaller values of tan β ? 1.8,Itop = 0.4 and the ratio (mντ /mνe) has a substantial contribution due to the rise of the top quark Yukawa coupling near the uni?cation scale which leads to the central value of Cντ /Cνe ? 83.6 and mντ /mνe ? 1.1 × 1011.These may be compared the results of BKL[7] corresponding to Cντ /Cνe ? 7.6 and mντ /mνe ? 9.2 × 109.Whereas in the large tan β region,our enhancement factor is only 2-3,for smaller tan β=1.8,the enhancement factor ia

as large as ? 10. Similar features are also noted in intermediate scale SUSY SO(10) model corresponding to MX = 1013GeV where the intermediate gauge symmetry breaks down to the standard gauge group giving large mass to MN [4]. When the ratio mντ /mν? is examined as a function of tan β, similar type of enhancements are noted. For example, in the supergrand desert type models (MX ? 2 × 1016GeV), Cντ /Cν? ? 65 and mντ /mν? ? 1.2 × 106 for tan β = 1.8, exhibiting an enhancement of hierarchy by a factor ? 15 over the BKL value[7] of mντ /mν? ? 8.1 × 104GeV.The details of evaluation of neutrino masses and mass ratios including uncertainties,as a function of intermediate scales and tan β would be reported

elsewhere.

In summary we have obtained analytic formulas for left–handed Majorana– neutrino

masses at low energies demonstrating, for the ?rst time ,the existence of a new hierarchy

7

between the neutrino masses which depends quite signi?cantly upon tan β in the region of smaller values of this parameter. These results hold true in a large class of models including SO(10). We suggest that these formulas be used while estimating neutrino mass predictions in uni?ed theories with a degenerate right–handed Majorana neutrino mass. The formulas can be easily generalised for nondegenerate right-handed neutrino masses.

After this work was completed,the contents of ref.[13] was brought to our notice where the renormalization for mντ has been discussed,but to prove the new hierarchy low energy formulas for all the three neutrino masses ,as demonstrated here,are essential.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

One of us (M.K.P) thanks Professor R.N.Mohapatra for useful discussions and to Dr.K.S.Babu for useful comments and bringing ref.[13] to our notice.The authors acknowledge support from the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi through the research project No. SP/S2/K–09/91.

8

REFERENCES

[1] For a review see W.de Boer, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 33, 201 (1994). [2] P.Langacker and M.Luo, Phys.Rev.D 44, 817 (1991); U.Amaldi, W.de Boer and

H.Furstenau, Phys.Lett.B 260, 447 (1991). [3] S.Dimopoulos, L.J.Hall and S.Raby, Phys.Rev.Lett. 68, 1984 (1992); Phys.Rev.D

45, 4192 (1992); G.Anderson, S.Dimopoulos, L.J.Hall, S.Raby and G.Starkman, Phys.Rev.D 49, 3660 (1994); K.S.Babu and R.N.Mohapatra, Phys.Rev.Lett. 74 2418 (1994); ibid. 70, 2845 (1993). [4] Dae–Gyu Lee and R.N.Mohapatra, Phys.Rev.D 52, 4125 (1995); M.Bando, J.Sato and T.Takashashi, Phys.Rev.D 52, 3076 (1995);M.K.Parida, ICTP Report IC/96/33, Phys.Rev.D ( to be published ). [5] M.Gell–Mann, P.Ramond and R.Slansky, in Supergravity, Proceeding of the Workshop, Stony Brook, New York 1997, eds. P.Van Nieuwenhuizen and D.Freedman ( North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980 ); T.Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Uni?ed Theory and Baryon Number of the Universe, eds. O.Sawada and A.Sugamoto, (KEK, Tsukuba ) 95(1979); R.N.Mohapatra and G.Senjanovic, Phys.Rev.Lett. 44, 912 (1980); Phys.Rev.D 23, 165 (1981). [6] For a recent review see J.Brunner, CERN Report, CERN–PPI/97 - 38 (1997) (unpublished). [7] S.A.Bludmann, D.C.Kennedy and P.G.Langacker, Nucl.Phys. B374, 373 (1992). [8] K.S.Babu, C.N.Leung and J.Pantaleone, Phys.Lett.B 319, 191 (1993). [9] M.K.Parida and M.Rani, Phys.Lett.B 377, 89 (1996). [10] S.G.Naculich, Phys.Rev.D 48, 5293 (1993); N.G.Deshpande and E.Keith, Phys.Rev.D 50, 3513 (1994).

9

[11] H.Arason, D.J.Castano, E.J.Piard and P.Ramond, Phys.Rev.D 47, 232 (1993); H.Arason, D.J.Castano, B.Keszthelyi, S.Mikaelian, E.J.Piard, P.Ramond and B.D.Wright, Phys.Rev.D 46, 3945 (1992).

[12] V.Barger, M.S.Berger and P.Ohmann,Phys.Rev.D 47, 1093 (1993). [13] K.S.Babu,Q.Y.Liu, and A.Yu.Smirnov,hep-ph/9707457.

10

- Double Beta Decay Constraints on Neutrino Masses and Mixing Reanalysis with KamLAND Data
- Probing Low Energy Neutrino Backgrounds with Neutrino Capture on Beta Decaying Nuclei
- Rigidity-dependent cosmic ray energy spectra in the knee region obtained with the GAMMA exp
- Core, Mantle, Crust Imaging the Earth's Interior with Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Tomography
- Three-Flavor Analysis of Neutrino Mixing with and without Mass Hierarchy
- Running of Low-Energy Neutrino Masses, Mixing Angles and CP Violation
- Understanding Supernova Neutrino Physics using Low-Energy Beta-Beams
- Low-energy neutrino beams with an upgraded Fermilab proton driver
- Neutrino oscillations with three-generation mixings and mass hierarchy
- Ultrahigh energy neutrinos with a mediterranean neutrino telescope

更多相关文章：
**
...***for* *neutrino* *masses* *with* *$tan* *beta$-dependent* *hierarchy*_....pdf

*Low-energy* *formulas* *for* *neutrino* *masses* *with* *$tan* *beta$-dependent* *hierarchy*_专业资料。Using radiative correction and seesaw mechanism,we derive analytic ...**
Supersymmetric Corrctions to ***Masses* and Widths.pdf

Their*mass* is related to the s*neutrino* *mass* ...1 , *tan*2 (β ) + 1 (3) where *tan*(β )...However, analyses including process *dependent* ...**
***Low* *energy* physics and left-right symmetry. Bounds on the ....pdf

2 MZ2*mass* and *low-energy* neutral current ...Four-fermion *neutrino*-hadron (νN ), *neutrino*-...?L,R (d), *tan* ΘL,R = ?L,R (d) Until...**
Relating leptogenesis parameters to light ***neutrino* *masses*_....pdf

$\tilde m_\alpha$ and $\theta_{\alpha\*beta*}$, and the *neutrino* ma...*For* light *neutrino* *masses* *with* normal *hierarchy*, we ?nd the following ...**
...of ***Neutrino* *Masses* Anarchy versus *Hierarchy*_免费....pdf

免费*Low-energy* *formulas* *for* ... 暂无评价 10页 免费如要投诉违规内容,... Models of *Neutrino* *Masses* Anarchy versus *Hierarchy* We present a quantitative...**
...study on the correlation between CP violation in ***neutrino* ....pdf

*mass* has a strong *hierarchy* in the diagonal ...*neutrino* oscillation and double *beta* decay ...*With* this working hypothesis, from the *low* *energy*...**
Improved bounds on SUSY accompanied ***neutrino*less double *beta* ....pdf

accompanied*neutrino*less double *beta* decay_专业资料...require Rparity violation in the *low* *energy* ...L,R are soft sfermion *masses*, Af are soft ...**
***Neutrino* Yukawa couplings and FCNC processes in B decays in ....pdf

*Neutrino* Yukawa couplings and FCNC processes in B...(2) at the *low* *energy* scale. As discussed ...*tan* β and the sign of the Higgsino *mass* ...**
Twisted Family Structure and ***Neutrino* Large Mixing.pdf

*masses* as well as the *neutrino*’s Majorana ...we have a freedom to choose the *low-energy* 5?...1 (7) where *tan* β is the mixing angle of ...**
Running of ***Low-Energy* *Neutrino* *Masses*, Mixing Angle....pdf

Running of*Low-Energy* *Neutrino* *Masses*, Mixing Angles and CP Violation We ... and the solar mixing angle θ12 is quite large: *tan*2 θ12 = 0.45 ...**
Generalized Friedberg-Lee model ***for* *neutrino* *masses* and ....pdf

*neutrino* *mass* *hierarchy* (m1 < m2 < m3 ) is ...(3)-(6), we obtain *tan* θ = 3 (b ? c)...*lowenergy* scales, it can certainly be extended ...**
nuMSM--Predictions ***for* *Neutrino*less Double *Beta* Decay.pdf

nuMSM--Predictions*for* *Neutrino*less Double *Beta* ...*For* normal *neutrino* *mass* *hierarchy* we have (as ...It is worth noting, however, that *for* *tan*2 13...**
Measuring ***neutrino* *masses* and dark *energy* *with* weak....pdf

*Low-energy* *formulas* *for* ... 暂无评价 10页 ...1 and/or is time-*dependent*. In the ?rst case...erences in the *neutrino* *mass* *hierarchy*, ?m2 ? ...**
On Effects of the Large ***Neutrino* B-Term on *Low* *Energy* Physics....pdf

*Neutrino* B-Term on *Low* *Energy* Physics_专业资料。...*neutrino* *mass* from *beta* decay experiments and ...m2 / *tan* β. Assuming that the other ...**
Is the lepton flavour changing observable in $Z to mu^pm + ....pdf
**

log(m3 /m2 ) where mj is the*neutrino* *mass*....Only the mj -*dependent* ?nite part of the loop... + ?+ ) We note that the *low* *energy* e+ +...**
***Neutrino* *masses* and unification of the gauge and Yukawa ....pdf

limits on the*low* 0 email: Kamila.Kowalska@fuw.edu.pl 1 *energy* ...erent values of the *neutrino* *masses* and *tan* β = 2.1, 44 respectively....**
...Quark, Charged Lepton, and ***Neutrino* *Masses* in SU....pdf

*neutrino* *mass* and a *hierarchy* factor, we have ...*low* *energy* predictions: the *masses* of the ...(including *tan* β, the ratio of Higgs vevs in...**
...the ***Neutrino* *Mass* Matrix *Low* and High *Energy* Phe....pdf

*Hierarchy* from Scaling in the *Neutrino* *Mass* Matrix *Low* and High *Energy* ...ective *mass* *for* *neutrino*less double *beta* decay larger than 0.045 eV. ? ...**
...Baryon Triality Model ***for* *Neutrino* *Masses*_免费下....pdf

Simple Baryon Triality Model*for* *Neutrino* *Masses*...are consistent *with* the stringent *low-energy* ... but *with* a much smaller *hierarchy* of *mass* i ...**
Optimal ***$beta$*-beam at the CERN-SPS.pdf

LEAD ION BEAM EMIT*TAN*... 暂无评价 3页 免费 ... A $\*beta$*-beam *with* maximum $\gamma=150$ (...*low* *energies*: the three *neutrino* *masses*, mi (i... 更多相关标签：

Their

2 MZ2

$\tilde m_\alpha$ and $\theta_{\alpha\

免费

accompanied

Running of

nuMSM--Predictions

log(m3 /m2 ) where mj is the

limits on the

Simple Baryon Triality Model

LEAD ION BEAM EMIT